FourPacketsOfPeanuts @ FourPacketsOfPeanuts @lemmy.world

Posts

8

Comments

992

Joined

2 yr. ago

Modern society / politics / voters / globalisation has completely failed to protect the workers of the West who are continually squeezed by any number of factors.

The last resort is to attempt to need society less: making ones own food, rejecting consumerism, upcycling/recycling, changing entertainment tastes, consciously rejecting marketing etc

How can someone not value the ingenuity and creativity behind a work of art?

Their point of view is that if people do actually value this then there will always be a market for it.

If they don't, there won't.

I suppose a long time ago the radio and gramophone looked like they'd been the end of live performing musicians but they still exist, everything's just continually changing..

I'm going to need class 101 on 411 as I've no idea what it is

Time to be self sufficient to be honest..

For your info, this is known as 'hand waving'

It's not a very useful currency if deflation is making people hoard it..

I tend to enjoy being devil's advocate on controversial subjects so I'd score a 9/10 fucked through sheer misinterpretation

♬ One of these things is not like the others.. ♬

I suppose it adds some context. They aren't separate adoptive dads who've cooperated to abused their respective sons, neither did the state allow an adoption to two single straight men living together- that they're a gay couple explains the situation.

I'm pretty sure imagemagick posterize would allow you to specify a palette but I've not done it myself

Edit: this seems to be what you're after

Ok, that's great. I get what you're trying to do now.

I think in terms of getting input I can only suggest that deliberately invoking Cunningham's law is probably going to get you more responses that anything else. You are honest and upfront about the code being unstable but this is unlikely to motivate someone to audit it for you. Simply stating it's the most secure web chat available for x reasons is more likely to motivate someone to prove you wrong. Even if their motivations are negative you might still find the insight valuable..

I suspect such a model would have to be far more attuned to its data being smaller but trustworthy. Something like chatGPT for example requires a huge volume because it's weakly affected by any particular datum going in. It's designed to adapt to general conversation norms, rather than specific facts. If you could take a generalist like chatGPT and combine it with an expert model that's been told everything it's told has a huge weighting then that would probably be a big step forward.

urgh .

It can survive well where there's editorial control. I'd talk to an AI if it had only read encyclopedias for example..

Musk making the typical American mistake of thinking politics here is as polarised in the US.

No, the British right doesn't automatically support the jailed Yaxley-Lennon. Some think he's just a gobby twat.

Search is eventually going to be so enshitified that the way to actually find out things is going to fall back on "ask someone you trust who knows things you don't". At least by that point those trustworthy people should be better informed than in the past..

This is beautiful. If only all tutorials were actually written well.

Even amongst Britain's right leaning folk this is a pretty stupid take..

AP, Reuters, BBC, the Guardian, the Financial Times, the Economist, also Ground News (at risk of sounding like a YT content producer)

Impressive! I assume this must be the part ii of each day?

Meanwhile I spent a lot of time pulling my hair out on day 2 part ii because I read the question wrong..