Flumsy @ Flumsy @feddit.de

Posts

0

Comments

193

Joined

2 yr. ago

was the US justified in genociding native americans also?

No. Would you say its justified to attack the US today (because of that genocide)? I certainly wouldnt.

Alright, Im fine with that definition, thanks for clarifying that.

However, if I invest part of my money (eg. into stocks or ETFs) as you do if you want to start saving money, that would make me a capitalist, wouldnt it? Your previous comment kind of made it seem like all capitalists are evil and rich af...

ethnoreligious state that excludes people of other ethnicities (Arabs, Africans, etc) and other religions (Muslims, Christians, etc)

So what? Thats their business what rules they want to have inside their country. Thats nl reason to attack them.

forced expulsion of those people, so it must be taken down and the genocide must cease.

Forced expulsion is dtill inside their own country. So you take them down with a genocide yourself? Fight fire with fire?

Would you mind elaborating on the "original libertarianism"? What doed that mean exactly? Could really find much...

Freedom good! Borders allow different systems or countries to exist so you have the FREEDOM to choose the one you like the most instead of there being only one option. Borders good!

Why not? Capitalism is the most fair system to me.

An ethnocentric state in a land inhabited by other religions and ethnicities.

• In land bordering the lands of lther religions and ethnicities.

What exactly justifies the takedown of Israel? That its religion is different or what? Thats none of ghe other countries business.

Yeah of course thats why there are regulations in place. Nobldy would trust that milj seller again though, so for cases that are not as bad as a human life being ended, the system would still work...

This was on a different level though. Taking civilian hostages? Launching rockets with the target being a music festival?

So then, why is their official goal to destroy Israel? Thats 100% a religious war

That's bad. But why are borders bad?

One group took 2 years to organize an attack on civilians, the other didnt...

Thats still very much generalizing. What this meme essentially says is that if you're a capitalist, you're not part of Lemmy.

On a seperate note, you cant possibly know how many people on Lemmy actually support capitalism or not. It has a left tendency, yes, but I bet the majority of Lemmx users do support caputalidm in some shape or form.

Is there any system that is more fair and/or gives you more freedom? I havent found any.

On a hypothetically completely free capitalist market, I can sell and buy whatever I wish and the value that I get when selling directly correlates to the value I'm bringing to the buyer. If I generated a lot of value, I have more capital so I can also buy more value using that capital. Sounds fantastic in theory.

The dictionaries say otherwise. But sure, if "capitalist" just means a person thats very succesful and uses their power for the bad, then they are obviously not good to society but that doesnt make the system of capitalism any worse...

If that were the case (which it isnt) I dont see a problem defending billionaires (and on the side also everybody's freedom and justice)...

So everybody on Lemmy is non-capitalist is what you're saying?

It was pretty obvious from my comment that I live in a European city with a subway...

I didnt say my comment applied to all European cities either.

... where you live. Where I live (in central Europe) we have a subway every 2-3 minutes and you're at worst 2 blocks away from a stop. It all depends on the infrastructure. A subway cant be stuck in traffic...

That was pretty complicated, here is a simpler answer I hsve come up with:

1=(2x2x2)/(2x2x2)=2³/2³=2³⁻³＝2⁰

If that makes sense to you...