FlowVoid @ FlowVoid @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

2,031

Joined

2 yr. ago

He wasn't charged with any crimes by the ICC.

The slopes are all the same

No, they aren't. Because it's a semilog graph.

Presidential elections are run by states. They keep track of who is registered to vote, they run polling places, they print ballots, they own the machines that are used to cast and/or count votes, and every election worker ultimately reports to - and is paid by - their governor.

The president has no role, at all. He can't hire election workers, can't access polling places, can't look at voter registries, and has no voting machines. Intentionally, to avoid schemes like yours.

So to extend the dialog:

Biden: Hey, all the governors flaked out so I'm hiring people to rerun the election myself. I'll pay you $10,000. Bring 699,999 of your friends, we gotta build a whole new bureaucracy from scratch.

Passerby: Is that even in your budget?

Biden: Maybe. Maybe not. I'll pay you $100,000! Also, order a voting machine on Amazon. I'll reimburse you later.

Passerby: I'm never getting paid, am I?

Biden: Are you helping me or not? Also I need your home address, it's gonna be a polling place. I'll throw in $200,000 for your legal fees if you're arrested for election fraud, like those false electors in 2020 that you bear no resemblance to!

Passerby: No thanks.

Biden: But I got immunity, baby! Immunity!

Biden: Hey, it's the POTUS. Your state needs to repeat the election. Make sure they use RCV, and I want you to tell the police to arrest nonvoters.

Governor: No.

Biden: But I'm immune from prosecution

Governor: Still no.

Biden: I'll come down there and kill you with my bare hands!

Governor: I don't think so.

Biden: I'll send Seal Team Six to do it, and then pardon them!

Governor: They know you can't pardon state murder charges.

Biden: You know immunity isn't all it's cracked up to be.

Even with the "broad immunity granted by the SCOTUS", Biden can't do what you want him to do. Immunity from prosecution does not mean ability to rewrite election laws.

Ambassadors are largely immune to prosecution too, do you think they can rerun our election?

Jack Teixera- the Discord Leaks Guy. After they were discovered, it took all of a week

The leak occurred in 2022, he was indicted in 2023, and he was sentenced in 2024.

And he pled guilty.

Special cases cut both ways. Judge Cannon and the SCOTUS would agree with you that Trump was a special case, thus delaying the case further.

Judge Chutkan insisted on treating Trump like any other defendant. I think she had the right approach.

Just for comparison, the Feds indicted some random person for selling pirated TV shows in 2019 and didn't get a conviction until this month. That's five years, and the SCOTUS wasn't even helping him drag the case out.

Federal cases take a long time when defendants insist on going to trial and dragging things out.

You should reread his speeches. He didn't lie about being a progressive. He was openly a centrist.

He never promised single-payer health care or a public option. He promised to stop insurance companies from excluding people with preexisting conditions, which he did.

He never promised to end all the wars. He promised to withdraw troops from Iraq and send more troops to Afghanistan, which he did.

And he didn't say anything at all about taxing the rich or helping unions.

Zen's fascists will control you

One hundred percent natural

You will jog for the master race

And always wear the happy face

Close your eyes, can't happen here

Big bro on white horse is near

The hippies won't come back, you say

Mellow out or you will pay

Mellow out or you will pay

The US may be the backbone of NATO, but that just means NATO can destroy Russia 20 times over.

Without the US, NATO can only destroy Russia twice over.

For one thing, the Netherlands has nearly the lowest wealth inequality in the world, yet it is a democracy.

He ran as someone who would bring together Blue America and Red America in the spirit of bipartisanship.

From the beginning, he intentionally reached out to Republicans.

We worship an awesome God in the blue states, and we don't like federal agents poking around in our libraries in the red states. We coach Little League in the blue states and, yes, we've got some gay friends in the red states.

His 2008 acceptance speech at the DNC mentions "Republicans" five times, and never in a disparaging manner. It does not mention labor unions even once.

Tonight, I say to the American people, to Democrats and Republicans and independents across this great land — enough! This moment — this election — is our chance to keep, in the 21st century, the American promise alive.

The Bush-McCain foreign policy has squandered the legacy that generations of Americans — Democrats and Republicans — have built, and we are here to restore that legacy.

I love this country, and so do you, and so does John McCain. The men and women who serve in our battlefields may be Democrats and Republicans and independents, but they have fought together and bled together and some died together under the same proud flag. They have not served a red America or a blue America – they have served the United States of America.

The challenges we face require tough choices, and Democrats as well as Republicans will need to cast off the worn-out ideas and politics of the past.

And I've seen it in this campaign. In the young people who voted for the first time, and in those who got involved again after a very long time. In the Republicans who never thought they'd pick up a Democratic ballot, but did.

Clinton and Obama are still alive today, they are still centrist, and they are still extremely popular.

If Trump got his way and was allowed to run for a third term in 2028, is there any doubt that Obama could defeat him?

There is no duality in which savvy, intelligent political players arrive at "Centrism wins,"

Obama and Clinton were centrists. They won.

some people just voted for President and left the rest of the ballot blank

Yes, that's exactly what they did. They intentionally left a blank next to Sanders's name.

They sure didn't do that in Wisconsin. In Wisconsin, voters made sure to vote for Tammy Baldwin. In fact, many people voted for Tammy and left the presidency blank, or even voted for Trump. And Wisconsin is equally un-impoverished and even less unequal than Vermont.

Likewise Ruben Gallego and Elissa Slotkin proved their ability to bring in people who didn't want to vote for Harris. Whereas Sanders failed. The future of the party lies with those who deliver actual results.

Sanders supporters keep making excuses for him, but the fact is that his supposed ability to bring in non-Democrats has never been demonstrated in a real election. It's just wishful thinking, exactly the same as "There's plenty of reason to think that Kamala will be popular with white women".

I'm not talking about the primary. I'm talking about the general election we just held. There were plenty of Senators running for re-election, including Bernie.

Nearly all of those Senators won more votes than Harris. In other words nearly all won over Harris voters and won over some non-Harris voters on top of that.

But not Bernie. Unlike the other Senators, he failed to outperform Harris. So it's clear he doesn't have some magical power to win the votes of people who don't vote for Democrats. Quite the opposite, in fact.

Even if she took zero steps towards the goal, that's infinitely preferable to Trump's pushing for annexation of the occupied territories and dismantling the Palestinian Authority.

From the river to the sea, Palestine will be Israeli.

Bernie can't bring out people who don't vote. If he could, he would have won a lot more votes in Vermont.

they'll vote Republican again.

That's not how midterms usually work. More people will vote for Democrats in 2026 than 2024. The key is maximize just how many more.