Flag @ Flag @kbin.social

Yes

---

Read more

Posts

0

Comments

64

Joined

2 yr. ago

Its what we're gon a get in the nordics i heard. Global warming - more evaporation - rain in northern europe. In stark contrast to those shitstains saying they look forward to a more mediterranian weather
... yay...

For shit thats coming out:

• Baldur's Gate 3. Waoweee 22 years

For shit that isnt out:

• Star Citizen... one of these days man :| yes i have an unrelated copium subscription @
• Command & Conquer 4. C&C3 was/is great, so it makes sense to get C&C4 eventually.

Whats the source on this? If there is any

Scorpion King.

Dumb fun and i love it.

Also as someone else said already, Equilibrium and Prince of Persia.

One word: projection.

You didnt criticize for shit, just a meager and baseless accusation. Bye bye.

Also, to actually jump to using a wish for someone to get shot, either as suicide or by aomeone else, well there aremt that many other eays that tops that one in showing a frankly hillarious lack of a real point or argument.

Tl;dr: you suck at presenting an actual argument. Are you a genuine child, or a poorly educated adult?

Dishonest? Nice claim, care to back it up? If you can?

The standard is simple; provide something beyond a surface level claim. Or at least make an effort to make the claim seem reasonable. In this example, the original commenter you've jumped to defend portrays the dems as if its all their fault... but is it? As mentioned, there is the figurative elephant (gop) in the room, and all the shit they do, but ... No, the focus was on having selected biden. Not only that but also implying the blm marches were the root cause. But what about the reason for the marches? Or the actions by the elephant? Its not that the context doesnt exist just because, we all know it does. So, to then argue as if that context is gone... why should we take that as a serious and legit addition to the conversation, when its really not?

Its also amusing to see you call me/us "dishonest", as it seems to be the exact thing you are currently doing. Theres a word for this, and it is, besides being a tried and true tactic of the elephant: projection. Accusing others of what you yourself are or have been doing yourself.

So how about it?

Did you expect the same acceptance for empty words and unfounded claims too? You dont have a base right to get a proper reply, you have to earn it by making a good point (thats worth debating) in the first place.

Here is a pointer to where you wemt wrong: painting a picture as if this is lets say the dem fault, rather than the rampaging elephant in the room, the gop. Its an old method of "arguing", and if you want to be taken seriously, should have picked a different tactic. But you didnt so... here we are.

Doesnt it mostly go to Africa etc?

Didnt he basically already do that, but the trumpsterfire declined?

Ey i was gonna say that! :D

One word: throughput.

The hyperloop sucks for that. Haaaaard.

Was it out of context tho? Theres a lot of context that supports the idea that he really just doesnt care for large scale efficiency, but that he instead leans hard into what is convenient for someone in his position, or near to. The underground tesla tubes comes to mind. True, he never publically admitted to the idea that the hyperloop was meant to torpedo the train project, but it sure contributed, and now California get no train (for now), the car centric society still reigns supreme and he stands to gain by being a large share/stakeholder in the company that sells what is probs the most well known EV atm (important given its California and the general trend of EVs vs ICEs).

Not proof, but he remains suspicious as fuck.

Also, as im sure you're aware, there are a fairly sizable group of genuine apologists who pretend to be different things just to dodge criticism. So any attempt to do what you did here is auto-sus. ;p

EVs are nice, but still a car. And battery-production isnt entirely clean either...

Capacity, wooo!

.... and the lack thereof.

You sound a bit like a Musk apologist, ngl.

👍

Is all good.

Its an alternative to jeans, stretchy or otherwise.

Chinos.

Never said you were, but that doesnt mean the cutoff point has to be all the way "out there" for conservative and problematic in the long run.

Besides, what do you even know about "me" given you say you used to "be like me"? You know, well perhaps not nothing but not much. And i too have met people with lots of different oppinions, yet i didnt leap towards the right, quite the opposite in fact. So... if you "used to be similar to me", well then you're close to falling into the deep end.

Here is some free advice: careful with what you assume you know about someone you never met before.

Pffft, just means that your beliefs have consequences.

Something something tolerance paradox.