Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)FI
Posts
0
Comments
187
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • It's yog again. Take a peek at his profile and it's readily evident what he's all about. 6k posts/comments in 4 years. He's literally on here on average every day usually posting some new easily disproven/rabidly biased/propaganda. And when he does bother to argue it takes 30 seconds to deconstruct his argument after which he resorts to name calling and finally blocking you. Lol.

    Still nothing to see here and likely never will be anything to see here.

  • Yes I know. But it's also transmitted via normal sex. So why is oral the criteria rather than the regular sex?

    "We can have sex as long as you don't go down on me because I don't want to get a panel done"

    See- it doesn't make sense

  • Buddy you have issues. Literally I've pointed out that it's easy to see whatvyouvare about by looking at your profile. That's it. Oh also calling you a propagandist... which you are by definition. And again- I literally GAVE YOU THE DEFINITION of ad hominem. Which you don't like so now you claim I'm the one who doesn't know what it is. Lol. Literally brain dead.

    My position is that people should actually do a bit of research into something before just jumping onto obvious propaganda. I've stated that explicitly and implicitly throughout this entire time here. That you can't figure it out is really a you problem. That you now admit you don't have a position- when you previously accused me of not addressing any of he points you made just shows you have no idea what's going on. I'd guess you are the drunk one here.

    Please point to the facts you are referring to- I'd love to discuss any that I failed to address earlier

    If that's entertainment for you- well good. Because you have definitely entertained me here. Lol. This is why i say you are so bad at what you do- you say a thing (you dont know what ad hominim is)- someone provides a fact/source/rebuttal (the definition of ad hominem)- and you make personal attacks because you dont like it took 30 seconds to disnantle your argument. So sad mate.

  • Oh yeah? I've already pointed out your posting of disinformation in previous comments. Your response? Blocking me because you knew I was right. Literally half the time you post something the second page of your own source completely discredits your original point. You post clickbait and don't even bother to read it yourself clown.

    I literally gave you the definition of ad hominem and you still fucked it up. You attack character- not position. You have made 0 counters to any arguments I've made. Purely attacking me personally. That's literally the definition of ad hominem. And you literally havent made any attempt at a point in this discussion- so literally nothing to counter. So yeah- goodbye indeed troll. Again.

  • Lol. Oh really?

    ad ho·mi·nem

    adjective

    (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

    prop·a·gan·dist Noun

    a person who promotes or publicizes a particular organization or cause.

    Which organization or cause am I promoting again? Meanwhile yours is full of anti west bullshit with terrible sources, easily disproven clickbait, and you constantly insulting anyone who dares take the 30 seconds it takes to dismantle your delusional ranting.

  • I bring her into it because she's a native speaker and I got her translation from it. Far better than you lot doing nothing/bad ai.

    I claim people are propagandists if they do nothing but give one sided views on their comments and posts without actually reading/researching the material involved. Easy to see since comment history is a thing.

    You asked for an alternate translation- I gave one. You on the other hand have done nothing but prove my point that you don't actually want to research anything and prefer to drink from the russia one nozzle.

    Oh also- try harder because your current amount of effort is pathetic.

  • It's not my wife. And I can understand a bit of Russian and ukrainian

    I can go through peoples history to say people have a bias... because it's just facts- those things you'd rather not engage with.

    And I only call out propaganda sources if they have a verifiable history of producing biased propaganda. If you aren't one of those people with an agenda then I guess you shouldn't be offended by it.

    Yeah- I know, it's not the tried and true method of not researching anything and just spouting talking head/russia one but it's the way things work.

    Try harder.

  • Still not getting it- if the cottonseed is fed to the cows why do you think the water should be attributed to textiles?

    Cottonseed fed to cows is obviously not going to be grown into cotton and used in textiles...

    Also I can't find mention of cottonseed at all in there.