Yes, the maximum energy that a syncrotron can accelerate a beam to is determined by its size and field strength. There are multiple rings that are used to bring beams up in energy levels before feeding to the next. Each ring has many bunches of particles circulating. So each bunch has to be going close to the same speed. You wouldn't want to do all the accelerating in one ring because it wouldn't allow nearly continuous operation.
As for two intersecting points, the collisions involve colliding two beams. So there's two different kicking/injecting points one for each direction.
Bucket style towel warmers don't require any installation and can be had for $100-$150 (actually I got mine from aldi for like $65). Maybe it's time to restore your previous standard of living?
Maybe they should have borrowed corporate lingo to call for right-sizing police, or restructure community resources.
"Defund the police" is such obviously bad marketing that it makes you wonder if the people who coined the phrase were trying to help or hinder reform efforts.
This is one of the main reasons I use a wireless charger for nightly charging. The lint doesn't get packed in to a dense layer if you aren't plugging cables in all the time. My other reason is that I'm a clutz and snag dangling cables when reaching for stuff.
It depends on your definition of cheap, but towel warmers. Just pop your towel into a little tub with a heater a few minutes before jumping in the shower. Then it's as warm as if it just came out of the dryer by the time you get out.
Staying at hotels seems so lacking in luxury when you have to dry off with a cold towel.
This implementation doesn't seem particularly useful. However, I have long wanted maps to generate a weather forecast along route for long winter road trips. It can be pretty tedious to look up weather forecasts along a long drive and try to figure out if you'll encounter snow.
Yeah, I have a hard time getting excited about a moderately more capable synchrotron and I have a Physics background. I'm not opposed to a larger synchroton, but I'm not confident that they'll find anything particularly interesting like I was with the LHC.
Personally, I'd like to see a bigger effort to develop high energy plasma Wakefield accelerators. I think they have the potential to work with a wider variety of particles and shouldn't need months of pump down and cooling after any interruption. Plus minitiaturization of plasma accelerators have the potential to be disruptive for medical applications.
It's more a problem of the quality of the tortilla in my experience. With a halfway decent tortilla, I have no problems. Some grocery store tortillas are too stiff and don't stick to themselves in the slightest. You can masterfully roll them, but the moment your grip loosens, it all turns to chaos.
There's also no fail-safe condition. If there's a power failure or control system failure, things would go horribly wrong. Having the stations be the only safe resting point is a recipe for disaster regardless of how much redundancy is built into the systems.
I found out about that in college. Initially I thought it was some cleaning compound in the dorm toilets. I found out later that someone had put methylene blue in brownies they brought to a gathering as a prank.
It wasn't that great of a prank because it relies on people talking about the color of their urine well after the prank was done.
https://www.cern/science/accelerators/accelerator-complex
Yes, the maximum energy that a syncrotron can accelerate a beam to is determined by its size and field strength. There are multiple rings that are used to bring beams up in energy levels before feeding to the next. Each ring has many bunches of particles circulating. So each bunch has to be going close to the same speed. You wouldn't want to do all the accelerating in one ring because it wouldn't allow nearly continuous operation.
As for two intersecting points, the collisions involve colliding two beams. So there's two different kicking/injecting points one for each direction.
https://cds.cern.ch/record/2002005/files/CERN-ACC-2015-030.pdf