Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)FE
Posts
113
Comments
2,211
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Iran having nuclear weapons is a world ending scenario

    Less so than Israel having nuclear weapons but here we are.

    While I have no sympathy for religious dictatorship of Iran, it is Israel who are invading and bombing their neighbours as well as commiting genocide of Palestinians.

  • What?

    Killing one animal does not reduce the population of hundreds in any substantial way which could possibly be considered a pest control.

    So, yeah - he is a fucking psycho. He killed as a revenge.

  • If there were two and you have killed both that's also pest control. If there were hundred and you killed two - not really.

    Pests control objectives are either to

    • not allow the population to to grow or
    • reduce the overall population or
    • eradicate the population

    Killing one seagull or rat if there is hundreds of them in some area achieves neither of the three and is therefore not a pest control even if seagulls were classed as pests.

    Furthermore killing an animal by smashing it against a wall in front of children may mean that this person has either psychopathic or sociopathic tendencies. Thus, fucking psycho.

  • I am not ok with either. I wouldn't kill either.

    Pest control works differently. You are trying to kill as many individuals in a very short time span to cripple the population growth. Even if seagulls were classed as pest, killing one has nothing to do with pest control.

  • I called him a psycho, yes. He did kill for revenge, not for food. And in front of children.

    I don't have any issues with killing for food and I love a good steak.Killing as pests eradication is also OK before you ask. This was neither though.