FauxLiving @ FauxLiving @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

834

Joined

5 mo. ago

...so far

He thought you'd never ask

I'm certain that the executive branch will investigate itself and find nothing wrong.

You claim everything is AI and bathe in upvotes as people confuse your confident cynicism for actual insight.

It's just institutional racism with extra steps

Don't buy your popcorn from China

Uh, it's not a genocide. They're all terrorists and those baby penguins were throwing stones and so deserved to be air striked.

Ah, thanks, I didn't notice. I'm adblocked and piholed to the teeth.

https://leasticoulddo.com/archive

For the curious

That model that can parse their artwork had to be developed and refined upon other work.

What you're describing is fine tuning, not model creation.

You can train diffusion models from scratch, even on home hardware, using open source software. It is well with the capability of Nintendo to do this with their own artwork.

Adobe did, they created their models from artwork licensed from artists specifically for training their models.

There's no reason to think that Nintendo would use public diffusion models when they can train their own and have a model that more accurately reflects their style.

It's at the point now where I just assume a game will work and am rarely disappointed.

Often the games that "don't work" still run just fine, but the developers that use anti-cheat will stop you from playing.

As long as you like people yelling and cheering in the theater, you'll love it

My mom doesn't seem to know.

She knows where the browser is and how to adjust the volume and is having a great time.

Delete your Meta accounts, ffs

Everyone knows he's gone in 4 years and so making a massive investment that completely depends on Trump's tariffs being in place would be economic suicide.

So we get all of the short term market shock without any of the growth. Another masterful move by our orange in chief.

New Nichole just dropped

I started using anti-vaxx propaganda tactics satirically.

The goal is to show how the tactic is manipulative by applying it to something obviously not dangerous.

Water is easy, start insisting that "dihydrogen monoxide" is dangerous:

Celebrity just died? "They had dihydrogen monoxide before they died, maybe it killed them"

"All traffic fatalities in the last 5 years were link to people using dihydrogen monoxide"

"Dihydrogen overdoses kill people every year"

"Why is dihydrogen monoxide in everything? Why is big dihydrogen monoxide putting this in everything, what are they trying to do?"

"I bet Trump was on dihydrogen monoxide when he thought of his tariffs plan"

Etc

Social media users love to clutch their pearls.

Treating it like it's exploitative let's them get their little dose of outrage, it doesn't matter if it matches reality or not.

Despite the fact that, as you pointed out, to do so often requires that they assume some pretty offensive things (like, "a 19-20 year old is only good for sex and housework").

"Vote for the Breversal!"

What's the follow on effect from making generated images illegal?

Do you want your freedom to be at stake where the question before the Jury is "How old is this image of a person (that doesn't exist?)". "Is this fake person TOO child-like?"

When that happens, how do you tell which images are AI generated and which are real? How do you know who is peddling real CP and who isn't if AI-generated CP is legal?

You won't be able to tell, we can assume that this is a given.

So the real question is:

Who are you trying to arrest and put in jail and how are you going to write that difference into law so that innocent people are not harmed by the justice system?

To me, the evil people are the ones harming actual children. Trying to blur the line between them and people who generate images is a morally confused position.

There's a clear distinction between the two groups and that distinction is that one group is harming people.