FauxLiving @ FauxLiving @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

834

Joined

5 mo. ago

Thanks, I hate it

My yard is surrounded by pine forest, nature does a good job of keeping it from spreading too far. No flower beds, decorative plants in pots.

It's low maintenance and looks good enough for the backyard and I don't have neighbors close enough to complain about rhizomes.

fr fr

Hmm, I did not know that. Thanks

The CVE system protects everyone that uses computers. It is a public service that forms the core of cybersecurity in the US and many other places. It does not cost the database any more money if people use it to provide services to clients.

Letting a private corporation take it over and put it behind a paywall now means that security, like so many other things, will only be available to people with money. It will make software and hardware more expensive by adding yet another license fee or subscription if you want software that gets security updates.

In addition, a closed database is just less useful. This system works because when one person notifies the system of an exploit then every other person now knows. That kind of system is much higher quality if you have more people that are able to access it.

An industry being created and earning money by providing cybersecurity services shows how useful such a system is for everyone. There are good paying jobs that depend on this data being freely available. New startups only need to provide service, they don't need to raise the funds to buy into the security database because it is a public service. They also pay taxes (a significant amount if they're charging $30,000 per audit), more than enough profit for the government to operate a database.

It's not bad faith, it's just a learned behavior that's antisocial.

Outrageous comments are heavily rewarded in public social media where everyone is pseudo-anonymous. At the same time, almost nobody wants to be the person on the receiving end of outrageous takes.

We're rewarding the wrong behaviours.

I certainly agree that the texture of Poa Pratensis is much more pleasurable. However, being in zone 8 and not wanting to seed my entire lawn every year, I'm more familiar with E. ophiuroides and Zoysia japonica.

It's just how he's going to get around the prohibition on bills of attainder.

They only need to create law that can be arbitrarily enforced and then enforce that law on your enemies.

My Aunt Bee had lung cancer

Some commenters here really need to go and come into contact with Eremochloa ophiuroides

If you disagree with someone or someone tells you that you're wrong you can just immediately block them with no effort.

People are so used to being able to instantly ignore anybody that they never develop the skills to deal with people disagreeing with them or having support an argument.

It's a self-reinforcing cycle.

You should probably, and I mean this kindly, touch grass

I'd guess that it's because the diet stuff doesn't have as much corn syrup which would inhibit the foaming

That's not a haircut, it's a foam block covered with textured cloth that looks like hair.

Look at the side of his head, his hair color and the block are different and the real hair is combed backwards (not something you could do in that little space.

He's basically wearing a hat

It's a 40s thing that companies in the 00s decided to preemptively suck up all of the IP required to make it work.

Once the technology becomes cheap enough to sell to smartphone users there will only be a few companies who're legally allowed to create the devices so they can have a free monopoly.

Kind of like how Apple tried to patent everything related to multitouch screen smartphones and then sue all of their competitors out of business.

We don't have the available technology to make good AR that's cheap enough for consumers. But, when we do, you'll find that a few tech companies will claim ownership of key components because of products that they briefly made back in the 00s.

Google's Glass headset wasn't a product, it was an IP squatting strategy that sold a few units.

It's a hugely powerful tool.

However, as we all know, some people treat the terminal as if it is the very inky blackness, in which, writhes the tentacles of C'thulu itself.

I find the people that I disagree with have much better points, with significantly fewer radicals, idiots or crusaders.

Honestly, it gives me hope.

My best experiences online have been as part of smaller communities where you can actually know and recognize other people. I see people commenting on threads and I can remember them talking in a different thread (or multiple threads). So it is much easier to know 'ok that guy is touchy about this thing but is otherwise a decent person' and not treat everyone like a 1-dimensional character.

Otherwise I think that the idea of deleting all IP laws is just wishful (and naive) thinking, assuming people would cooperate and build on each other’s inventions/creations.

Given the state the world is currently in, I don’t see that happening soon.

There are plenty of examples of open sharing systems that are functional.

Science, for example. Nobody 'owns' the formulas that calculate orbits or the underlying mathematics that AI models are built on like Transformer networks or convolutional networks. The information is openly shared and given away to everyone that wants it and it is so powerful it has completely reshaped society everywhere on the Earth (except the Sentinel Islands).

Open Source projects, like Linux, are the foundation of the modern tech world. The 'IP' is freely available and you can copy or modify it as much as you'd like. Linus 'owns' the Linux project but anyone is free to take a copy of the Linux source code and modify it to whatever extent that they would like and form their own project.

Much of the software and services that people use are built on top of open source tools made by volunteers, for free; and most of the useful knowledge and progress for human society results from breakthroughs made in the sciences, who's discoveries are also free and openly shared.

To me it was the hypocrisy

There's one (at least) of them in every special interest group.