Skip Navigation

Posts
5
Comments
92
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Could you fit more flags in your name? Lmao

  • Now that you said it the name is kinda fitting haha. But its actually not intentional. All of my posts are brave related, but its just because I like the software.

  • Brave rewards are opt-in. You don't have to use it

  • They are funded almost exclusively by the worlds biggest ad company

  • Yeah I understand. FF don't call themselves a "mainline" normie browser though. They mislead people by marketing themselves as privacy and users interests first.

  • I disagree. Even those who don't care about privacy should have maximum privacy from their browser out of the box. People have a right not to be mistreated by nefarious actors.

  • That's fair enough but most of the web3 stuff is opt-in so you don't even have it on after first install.

  • Those who care for privacy aren't the ones most harmed by Mozilla's complacency. As good as LibreWolf is I wonder if it has even 1% of the users Firefox has.

  • Firefox markets itself as a privacy browser. Its their go to shtick. So the comparison is fair.

  • I think it is not misleading as the vast majority of non-techy users never tinker with such settings, so what the developer has configured out-of-the-box is what matters.

  • Chromium is free software. Google's control over it is the problem.

  • When questionable decisions are seen as a virtue because they are reversed.

  • Thats fine, but I also would argue against this kind of purity testing. Where a person is written off because they disagree with you on one or two issue. There are a lot of colorful characters in the community so you would quickly end up very alone...

    I think overall DT is a good advocate for FOSS.

  • I think at this point it still is. But it should get a chromium version in future!

  • The list is randomized, I've seen several screenshots with different order.

  • Ah yes the trust worthy browser without tracking that comes with Google search by befault. lol