I'd be surprised if I wasn't: Most things are within about a 25 minute walk for me, much less on a bike. Still though, I feel like that study's numbers were off.
They certainly don't have to be, but there is a well established pattern of the US government getting waaay too chummy with corporations to the point that it can undermine what's best for the people in pursuit of corporate interests.
I can see why you might connect the two, but I weigh 240 lbs and bike commute every day as long as it isn't freezing. Overweight and obese people ride bikes all the time.
Being sedentary is only part of the reason we're so fat: Can't out exercise a bad diet and we are barraged with highly processed foods to the point that you can accidentally eat a lot of processed stuff even when you're trying to eat healthy.
Oh, also, beer but I quit drinking so that should help lol
Yeah, aside from riding my bike, I would hardly call myself active but I sure as hell walk waaaay more than that. Even if I was above average (doubtful), these numbers seem off, especially for back then. With all sorts of delivery and micromobility devices these days, I figure we're walking even less than we did in the 90s but still more than 1.4 miles per week (you could easily walk that without even leaving a building)
These numbers seem way too low, 1.4 miles a week??? Even in 2024 where we have more means of transport than ever, I still walk more than that every day!
What the fuck is a "backups"?