FarceOfWill @ FarceOfWill @infosec.pub

Posts

0

Comments

290

Joined

2 yr. ago

The wider issue is you have to generate that energy, and you have to be able to capture more carbon than that generation released.

As I understand it doesn't at all. This is why it's seen as analagous to a perpetual motion machine, it's an endless chain of power plants capturing each others carbon to no end.

You could use solar of course, but then why generate anything with fossil fuels just to capture the carbon with solar? Just use solar.

It's not any of those reasons, it's because it can only exist by being trained on human authored art and in many cases you can extract a decentish copy of the original if you can specify enough tags that piece was labelled with.

The ai model is a lossy database of art and using them to launder copyright violations should be illegal, is immorally stealing from the creator, and chills future artists by taking away the revenue they need while learning. This leads to ai model art having not enough future work to train on and the stagnation of the human experience as making beautiful things is not profitable enough, or doesn't give the profit to those with power.

In a brief statement, the UK government said it had not been able to add its name to it because of concerns about national security and "global governance."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8edn0n58gwo

No idea if thats a real reason or not.

You're right, I'll edit a corrrection

Not to disrespect the amazing achievements of the Finn's in that war, but they lost, and lost half their country. (Edit: 10%, not half. Sorry Finland.)

Incredible job not to lose the whole thing ofc.

Great at raising money, even better at giving it to nvidia

At absolute best it's breaking even before debt service.

Maybe he's still not just paying rent on some buildings and miraculously hasn't been kicked out yet

Ask for the code and git history

The EU is doing great. It can pay for loads of stuff with the endless fines American tech companies rack up

I'm posting the same comment in two replies here now, terrible behaviour, but yes exactly this was an attempt to force a sale and get tiktok into American ownership.

It feels very neat that America would think tiktok would ultimately choose the option where it gets more money, but that the Chinese instead choose control.

The theory is the tiktok "ban" was an attempt to force a sale on favourable terms , but tiktok has called the bluff.

Not clicking but if this is the one from a while ago its specifically about plastic teabags. And, like, obviously.

If you stir with a plastic spoon you'll have even more

Has he ruled out licking them both so no one else wants them?

Thanks for writing this up, sounds even worse than I'd have guessed from the title.

The comments here show the real problem, adverts dont have to say why they've been selected.

All online ads should have to say which filters they matched to advertise to you. The advertising in most cases now is centralised into Google or Facebook, this is absolutely technically possible.

Right, Amazon can do it because their best workers already left or never existed. Gigantic churn rate, terrible reputation.

I think you've been down voted a little unfairly.

Yellow warnings are useful for people, to know a local stream will flood or to remember to bring in plant pots from the wind etc.

But they're not worth a real news story are they?

Thanks I finally understood this thread, kept thinking people were viewing the crocodile/duck/whatever from above

Our stalwart guardians of the land right there, we make them work so hard for their tax free inheritance

I'm glad it's not just me