FaceDeer @ FaceDeer @kbin.social

Basically [a deer with a human face](https://i.imgur.com/FlzELAa.png). Desp

---

Read more

Posts

0

Comments

2,392

Joined

2 yr. ago

Feel free not to, I guess. But again, that wasn't the point of my comment. You mistook bleistift2's statement in the opposite way it was intended. ChatGPT's not intended as a replacement for a search engine so evaluating it on that basis is misleading.

That's the opposite of what he said. That sort of usage isn't what ChatGPT is good for, it's best to use it for other kinds of things.

It's consuming the energy equivalent of 33,000 homes, okay. Is it doing work equivalent to 33,000 people or more? Seems likely to me.

Fediverse postings are probably also being used for AI training. Just so you won't be too shocked when it eventually comes out in the future.

Sora's capabilities aren't really relevant to the competition if OpenAI isn't allowing it to be used, though. All it does is let the actual competitors know what's possible if they try, which can make it easier to get investment.

Indeed, the level of obsession some people have with Elon Musk is kind of ridiculous.

Writing code to do math is different from actually doing the math. I can easily write "x = 8982.2 / 98984", but ask me what value x actually has and I'll need to do a lot more work and quite probably get it wrong.

This is why one of the common improvements for LLM execution frameworks these days is to give them access to external tools. Essentially, give it access to a calculator.

Exactly. Article looked fine to me, if it was AI-written then it did a good job.

It's not exactly training, but Google just recently previewed a LLM with a million-token context that can do effectively the same thing. One of the tests they did was to put a dictionary for a very obscure language (only 200 speakers worldwide) into the context, knowing that nothing about that language was in its original training data, and the LLM was able to translate it fluently.

OpenAI has already said they’re not making that publicly available for now

This just means that OpenAI is voluntarily ceding the field to more ambitious companies.

How dare they provide a useful tool like this, those bastards.

Why do you think so, and why does it matter?

Large language models are notoriously poor at math, you should probably use a different tool for that sort of thing.

Not so obscure that Meta isn't paying attention and planning for interoperation, and Meta is one of the biggest players in the AI development field.

A complete data set isn't required, just a comprehensive one.

I actually was on the job market just a few months back for the first time in 15 years. Those sorts of comedy postings are not common. It's true that often the position doesn't require as much experience as the "dream candidate" they're asking for in the job posting, but A) they're aware of that, and B) they take that into account when screening resumes. Lying on your resume is not required, it's only going to waste everyone's time if you do.

And I'm pretty doubtful that OP would be capable of producing usable work. He says it himself, he's being deceptive about his abilities.

They can't do the work without the data, though.

Or rather, they can't do the work without the risk of Reddit raising a legal fuss that would cost them more than $60 million. The data itself can already be downloaded for free from various places.

Step one in succeeding in a job is passing the interviews and getting that job.

OP was just wasting everyone's time, both his own and the interviewers.

OP said "Of course I don’t make it past 1 or 2 interviews in such cases." So it seems pretty straightforward that he wasn't qualified, as in he wasn't going to succeed in those roles.

The value comes from the work that can be done with it. If you can train an AI off it then it's worth something.

Nice to hear some solidly good news like this.