Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)EX
Posts
0
Comments
472
Joined
4 mo. ago

  • "Once upon a time in America, there was a tyrant. And Congress rejected him totally. The tyrant, of course, was King George III"

    Constantly spewing bullshit like that is exactly why your democracy crashed. When everything is part of some mystical "greatest nation in the world" fairly tale it's hard to recognize and defend truly important values.

    Congress didn't reject the King because he was a tyrant. American elites rejected the King to establish new system where they could reap all the benefits. Then they enslaved people and committed genocide to enrich themselves. It was greed, not bravery that motivated them.

  • Most people could live without youtube period. But what the fuck would be the reason to do it?

    You don't know why it would be good to stop exploiting children for clicks and ad revenue? Do you think a 12 yo can consent to live streaming their life for the whole world to watch?

    Even so, the much more ridiculous one to me is the second one.

    Cell phone bans are now common in schools. More and more research shows phones are bad for development.

    https://www.newsweek.com/overcoming-our-denial-about-smartphones-effect-kids-opinion-1926025

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958821000622

    But you want to give them to kids why exactly?

  • I've been thinking about it and here's my proposal:

    • total ban on hosting/streaming videos with kids below 16. Anyone uploading content with kids is immediately banned. Platforms hosting content with kids are prosecuted.
    • treat mobile phones like cigarettes. Parents giving phones to children < 16 are fined. If you want to track your kid get him a smart watch.

    Who's with me?

  • People stupid enough to believe this B.S. in the first place are not going to read articles debunking it. What you need is some over the top praise of his policy ideas. Keep it simple and flood low information voters with it.

  • I have a better LLM benchmark:

    "I have a priest, a child and a bag of candy and I have to take them to the other side of the river. I can only take one person/thing at a time. In what order should I take them?"

    Claude Sonnet 4 decided that it's inappropriate and refused to answer. When I explain that the constraint is not to leave child alone with candy he provided a solution that leaves the child alone with candy.

    Grok would provide a solution that doesn't leave the child alone with a priest but wouldn't explain why.

    ChatGPT would say that "The priest can't be left alone with the child (or vice versa) for moral or safety concerns." directly and then provide wrong solution.

    But yeah, they will know how to play chess...