ExLisper @ ExLisper @lemmy.curiana.net

Posts

1

Comments

495

Joined

4 mo. ago

The song clearly says he was misunderstood and the Heil Hitler is sarcastic. It's still cringe, sad and shows signs of mental illness but I don't see how it's "glorifying Hitler".

Ok, if you can't understand a simple point there's no point in talking, Cheers.

Take away his library card!

Why not just use birds? Birds fly for free.

I've watched this and I didn't see anyone using vi. WTF?

Fitter, happier, more productive, comfortable, not drinking too much, regular exercise at the gym three days a week, getting on better with your associate employee contemporaries, at ease, eating well, no more microwave dinners and saturated fats

A patient, better driver

Ok, time to use K because I'm sure as hell not using F.

I don't have cheese.

You're giving him too much credit. His motives are:

1. get richer
2. have people kiss his ass so he can feel like a big boy

That's it.

Real anti-Israel or just anti-genocide?

The most reliable way to sex a skeleton is with DNA.

What about sexing a pope?

Next say it to his face during one of the so called interviews.

So this is it... I'm going to die.

It's either because they want to pretend it's a civilized execution method by making it look better or because they want to keep the option of doing it wrong and making the victim suffer longer.

''endured pain beyond the “10-to-15 second” window of consciousness that was expected.''

So up to 15 seconds of agony is expected. Fucking barbarians.

There's nothing illogical about it. Police uses body cameras because they do want to use them. Can you think of any law that was passed against police? There were huge protests demanding police reform and nothing happened. The only thing that activists "won" were the body cams. That's because police and prosecutors find them useful. Sure, police was skeptical at first because the cameras were marketed as tool for accountability but as soon as they realized that they are actually tool for surveillance the adoption moved fast. That's the whole point the articles I've linked make and you find so hard to understand.

The DEA will stop using them because Trump's administration is incompetent and makes a lot of stupid decisions. Other agencies could stop using them but for now decided against it.

In another comment I posted a link to another study that shows police does not provide footage from most of police shootings. Yes, most of the time the camera is recording but most of the time only police can see the footage. That's what they mean by "highly controllable evidence”. When it exonerates the officer they give to the TV stations in a matter of hours. When it doesn't they hide it and you have to fight them in courts for years to see it.

Ok, this part may not be easy to understand. There were looking at use of force, citizen complaints, arrests and assaults on officers. The theory is that thanks to the use of body cams there will be less cases of use of force, less citizen complaints and less assaults on officers. The study says that in some of the evaluated body cam programs they found that those statistics didn't change or that they got more cases of use of force, citizen complaints and so on. Basically, it's not clear if the cameras help reduce police violence at all.

The second part (which you ignored) says that the cameras are actually used mostly to prosecute citizens, not police. Basically, thanks to the cameras police can easily prove offenses and convict people. Just like the first article said, police us body cams to surveil and prosecute people. Prosecutors like cameras because they make their job easier. You can deduct from this that police also likes cameras. Your claim that "police does not want to wear cameras" is baseless. There's probably some opposition at first but once they et used to them it's just another tool used to oppress people.

https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/research-body-worn-cameras-and-law-enforcement

"Across these evaluations, researchers looked at a range of outcomes, including use of force, citizen complaints, arrests, and assaults on officers. Four of the body-worn camera programs evaluated were found to have no, limited, or even negative effects."

https://cebcp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/BWCpaperLumetal.pdf

"Prosecutors, however, rarely bring cases against the police (Skolnick & Fyfe, 1993), and it remains to be seen whether this will change much as a result of BWCs. In their study of the use of BWCs in the courts, Merola et al. (2016) found that nearly all (93.0%) responding prosecutors’ offices in jurisdictions that use BWCs use them primarily to prosecute citizens. Not surprisingly, 80.0% of responding prosecutors in Merola et al.’s survey support BWC use by the police, and 63.0% feel cameras will assist prosecutors more than defense attorneys"

I know that probably no amount of research and evidence will change your mind but those are pretty easy to find so I just leave it here for other people to see.

Those headlines should read "They voted for their son to be put in ICE detention and now their son is in ICE detention". Stop pretending they didn't knew.