30 years ago creating content was hard but also destroying it was difficult. Now it's very easy to post shit online but internet is also full of bots, scrapers, malware, scam and spam. I don't think you can separate those two. We can keep the internet private and free but full of shit or make it safe and "fun" but difficult to access.
You make it sound like he actually lost some money. It's all just for show. It's not like he wanted to buy something but decided to donate money instead. He can still afford absolutely everything he could even want. He's not poorer in any meaningful way. The money his foundation has gives him power. Power to influence governments and policy (like he did with common core). His foundation has now more money than he donated so he has more power than before. It's a PR stunt.
Last I've checked Gates donated $60B to his foundation and now the foundation controls $90B. They got so many other donations Gates now controls more money then before.
so everyone who is alive now BECAUSE of all that information doesn’t deserve their life because of your ethical standards?
Where did you take this from? There's zero logic here.
What I'm saying is that if I would find a paper describing cure for cancer but I knew the author brutally murdered thousands of people in order to create it I wouldn't use it. I think using it would validate his methods and would be immoral.
Imagine someone would torture and murder your family in order to create covid vaccine. Would you still take it? Would you let the murder go free in exchange for his research?
edit: did you know particle board was invented by the nazis? ever buy any build it yourself furniture? better throw it out. ever drink a fanta soda?
Did they murder people to create it? If not what the fuck are you talking about?
Oh, so you actually went straight for "not letting lives go to waste". Nice.
For me using data obtained by murdering people is 100% morally wrong. It means that as long as you can distance yourself from the murdering itself you're free to benefit from it. Which is a disgusting take.
And US not only used this data, they actually made an exchange for it. They didn't just find it somewhere ans said "well, since we already have it...". They made a deal with the murderers. Even more disgusting.
What I like about java is it's consistency. It's not a great language but it's a solid tool. It's no trying to do anything brave, just steadily moves in the right direction.
Python is the exact opposite. There are at least 3 competing tools for everything, multiple ways to install packages, python 3 is not backwards compatible. Just setting up the environment is needlessly painful. It's not a bad language but a terrible tool.
Was the information valuable enough to torture people in order to obtain it? Do you think value of this information justifies what the Japanese did to these people?
Don't kid yourself. They gave him immunity because they didn't care. It's not like US never experimented on people. Or enslaved them. Or committed genocides. Or you know, dropped couple of atomic bombs on civilians just to see what will happen.
"- This guy says he has some info but want's immunity.
Sure, why not? It's not like he did anything we wouldn't do."
30 years ago creating content was hard but also destroying it was difficult. Now it's very easy to post shit online but internet is also full of bots, scrapers, malware, scam and spam. I don't think you can separate those two. We can keep the internet private and free but full of shit or make it safe and "fun" but difficult to access.