How are they inefficient or at least less inefficient than other solutions? That infrastructure is already there, unlike others. And air quality is more affected by other things than cars.
What would you be doing in ar with it? It just seems so awkward for any type of interaction and not really anything fun or worth anyone's time or especially money. They already said it wouldn't be 3d movies, except for very few, they would stay 2d. Also it would literally be cheaper to get other monitors.
I'm kinda confused so I want to see someone who is enough in the loop about the apple vr to explain this to me. If all it can do is watch movies and play 2d games and doesn't have enough battery life to watch a movie, why???
" wait it's just people pushing weird politics and a bunch of nsfw stuff and even the posts that seem good have some weird secondary agenda and other weird shit"
New York City tried that and we ended up with a subway full of crack addicts, homelessness, public nudity, etc. Trains should either be for a long trip but only once in a while or a last resort in a large city.
Only the ti83-84 are shit. The old ti89 and newer ti nspire are actually really good. I bought a ti89 on eBay for $20 and even though it is 20 something years old it's still better than there new ti84 color stuff.
Plane rides aren't for frequent and shorter trips. Cars are a cheap way to get there and you aren't restricted at all.