Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
15
Comments
499
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • And the diagram between those who use Lemmy and Linux is close to being a circle, but not just quite there yet

  • Maybe your wife likes feminine men and you just never realized you were one who knows. Maybe it's just a meme. Maybe we should all sudo rm -fr /* --no-preserve-root to remove all traces of French from our root

  • In time you will realize Linux was no cliff, but rather a field of grass in which to frolick happily, at least until you blow up the bootloader because you didn't know what you were doing.

  • Maybe add a comment/review system (if you haven't already) in the meantime? Far from foolproof but better than nothing nonetheless.

  • "tldr [command]" helps a lot more than --help without the verbosity of man. Just fyi.

  • Choke my computer to exit the text editor? I use nano. I only choke the computer when it asks seductively

  • Ok party pooper and how are we sure the pic you sent isn't gimped?

  • I'm not saying life can't be good but an infinite one is definitely overrated

  • But you're still pushing the responsibility to individuals, which is literally an oil company tactic.

    "You eat meat? Guess you aren't a real environmentalist after all!" Is not the way we'll get more people to quit eating meat. In fact you can't even know why they eat meat despite knowing it's bad for the environment. And it still won't address the problem.

    This isn't a race to moral purity.

  • And that's cool and all but ain't no way you will convince everyone to quit eating meat. Especially given that it's not always a matter of choosing. Even then acting morally superior ain't helping.

    It's the same discussion with cars, people will do whatever is most convenient and available, if you don't want people to use cars you don't go around telling tjem not to use it, you act on the city's design and public transport to make it so it is convenient to use the alternatives and then you start banning cars from city centers, then move towards the periphery, etc etc. All these are actions taken at the source. Sure telling people to mot use cars as much, to carpool, etc will help a bit but it ain't gonna solve your issues chief.

  • I will take getting old and decrepit over having to work forever for soulless companies amd shit. Then again it's not like I'm gonna see a pension anyways so I'd rather not get that old in the first place and die earlier.

    Our society ain't ready for this type of shit, get everyone to be young forever and most of us will be living sad lives working forever to make someone else richer. And furthermore you'd have a lot more old people, who grew up in a different context than young people and don't always tend to accept the fact the world is different now from when they were young, but they outnumber young people by such a huge margin that the voices of young people will be completely ignored and societal change will happen at a slow crawl, if at all, with a good portion of the population being unrepresented because "gotta cater to the majority if you want enough votes to win"... no thanks.

    The world doesn't need more old people and I sure as shit don't want to live in an even worse world than I have now. With climate change and all.

    Also I'm not sure if the wording in your first question is correct because, as it is now, it reads like if I don't like extending life to eternity (assuming you don't get shot, etc etc) then I must want to be old immediately which is a completely stupid jump to make so I'll assume it was misworded.

  • Well the main flaw in your reasoning is thinking that it's an issue addressed at the individual level rather than a greater systemic issue that cannot be addressed by the choice of individuals. And on top of that you colpevolise would-be allies whose life you don't know, ironically playing right into oil tycoons and meat industry's hands

  • Yes, that's yet another reason why we should ban cars from cities and put more green spaces.

  • So I can be overworked even longer? No thanks.

  • No, 2+2 = ๐ŸŸ so it would be 8รท2๐ŸŸ and since ๐ŸŸ is no longer a number it becomes 4๐ŸŸ. So the answer is 4 fishes.

  • There's a flaw in this problem, which is the fact Monty Hall didn't consider the possibility I may have a gun pointed to his head

  • Not if I bribe the people in charge of putting the prize behind the door it won't

  • Yes you csn, for example: math is what scientists do while on meth