Amazon already got serious several years ago, invested tons of money in their dev studios, bought huge licences, recruited talented people and still mostly failed to this day. I remember reading an article about Amazon's very hierarchical corporate structure that killed any attempt at the creativity needed to make a successful game but I can't seem to find it
I don't believe for a second that any of these big tech companies have a chance of making a significant dent in the videogame market, it's just too far from their own expertise
Sure, but Marx didn't invent socialism. The Commune itself was massively inspired by Proudhon's socialist ideas. Even before that, Saint-Simon's socialism influenced some factions that took part in the French Revolution.
All that to say that yeah, nowadays Marxism is the main socialist ideology, but it's not the only one
It depends a lot on what you actually mean by socialism and communism because these words can have very different meanings to different people and ideology.
As a very broad baseline, socialism is the socialization of the means of production, as opposed to the current privatization of those means. Now there are a lot of ways this could be done, and thus a lot of ways to define socialism. Some socialists want a strong State that can enforce strict rules of ownership, others want no State at all and a free cooperation between individuals, with a lot of variations in between. An anarchist, a communist, a social-democrat would all consider themselves socialists, even when they actually have very distinct ideologies.
Now communism, at least in its most recognizable form, is basically the end state of socialism in the Marxist ideology specifically. It designates a stateless, classless society in which each person contributes according to their ability and receives according to their needs. It's basically the end goal theorized by Marx that has never been achieved yet in History.
Ads is never just ads. It's primarily a business model that is fundamentally anti-consumer, because when your main remenue starts becoming showing ads to your user instead of selling them something of value, your priorities shift from trying to make a good quality product to trying to max out engagement in order to print as many ads as possible.
J'ai fini récemment le dernier tome paru des Archives de Roshar (The Stormlight Archives) de Brandon Sanderson après avoir dévoré toute la série en l'espace d'un mois ou deux, et j'en ressors en me disant que ça faisait bien longtemps que j'avais pas lu de la fantasy d'aussi bonne qualité. Je recommande vivement a tous les amateurs de littérature de l'imaginaire
Honnêtement quand je vois la façon dont certains cyclistes roulent en vélo électrique, je suis assez content qu'ils soient limités a 25km/h en agglomérations.
En revanche avec des voies et une infrastructure adaptées (notamment pour sortir et entrer des grandes villes) non seulement je vois l'intérêt hors agglo, mais je serais même carrément intéressé pour en acheter un en complément de mon vélo mécanique
I think you're spot on for Vision. If the last Phoenix Force buff taught me one thing, it's that the difference between a 4-cost card that can move and a 5-cost card that can move is truly massive. I guess Vision got a bit more appealing for a Shuri combo and a last turn move to bait Shang Chi though, that's probably something I'll want to try out.
The two toggles called "Consent" and "Legitimate interest" is one of the most jarring things I've seen since GDPR came out. Those are legal basis for processing data, they're not supposed to shown like that to the user, that just makes no sense.
User have to opt-in for processing activities that are based on consent, and be allowed to opt-out of processing activities that are based on legitimate interest, but to do that they must know what those processing activities are in the first place!
Edit: The more I think about it the more it makes my head hurt. What does a toggle just called "consent" mean? Am I opting in for "consent"? Why are they just writing "legitimate interest" without telling what is the interest and why it is legitimate? Complete nonsense
Paying money to work isn't something I would consider worth it. Sure, I might get a bit of free time in the evenings, but it doesn't seem like enough to justify the travel and lodging costs
It'll be on game pass so I'll probably still test it out, but I really don't get why a Payday game would need anti-piracy measures since the whole point is to play co-op
I've started playing The Pale Beyond, and I really love it so far. It's basically a mix of VN and a resource management game where you're put in command of a polar expedition in a 19th century-ish fictional world, and have to get your crew through the challenges of resource scarcity, extreme cold and interpersonal drama.
My only nitpick is that it's a bit too linear so I have to fight against my urge to savescum.
It's been a few months since I played it, and I remember I really enjoyed it at the time but ended up feeling a bit limited in what I could do: after the truly magical first few hours, everything seemed to devolve into a game all about numbers and lacking actual depth. Has there been interesting updates since?
This game is fascinating to me because of the range of reactions I've seen from players. Those who like it love it so much they call it a masterpiece, while those who don't like it really hate it.
It's also one of the only games I can think of which message (or at least what I personally interpret its message to be) gets less and less impactful the more people praise it. I feel like it only works if you go in blind and only expect a standard shooter, and really suffers from its reputation as a consequence. Expecting a fun shooter and getting this whole thing was a unique experience to me, while a friend of mine that played it expecting to find the experience he read about was super disappointed and hated it.
I hate this so much