Sure, but isn't there usually a limit of like 20 or 30 books at a time? And you can't take out more books after that without a) returning some of the old ones or b) admitting some of them are lost and paying to replace them.
My personal take is that - as with so many other conservative groups - they're going to act like victims regardless of what we call them, and referring to them politely has the effect of legitimizing their position. I suppose to a naive bystander it might make it seem like two groups of crazy people yelling at each other, but I'd still take that over a polite talk show roundtable any day.
a verb; meaning to do "EVERYTHING BUT" with someone. has developed from people carrying out this practice on holiday, on beaches. particularly with people whose names are unknown. the sand also makes it interesting.
girl one: so what did you do when you went to tenerife ?
girl two: i beached
girl one: niiiice
In fairness, for much of history it was perfectly normal for two people of the same gender to live together and eat together and sleep in the same bed and write affectionate letters to each other without that necessarily implying that they were lovers.
What I don’t get is how they were able to take out this many books - I understand (and generally agree with) policies to limit library fines, but that doesn’t mean you have to let people take out enough books to clear out an entire section.
"Irrationally and disproportionately" doing a LOT of work there.
If you don't care to actively support trans people, "polite indifference" is the only other appropriate response, as they're not hurting anybody by simply existing - mind your own business and let them mind theirs.
Yeah, if anything the fact that there's an actual organic non-subreddit-specific "fuck spez" message makes it seem less forced than the previous one did.
Just call it lunner or snunch or some other weird portmanteau monstrosity