Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)EN
Posts
0
Comments
221
Joined
2 yr. ago

  •  
        
    > Golf pal of dad go to Japan for business,
    > he has prostitute over,
    > goes at it like a wild rabbit
    > she keeps screaming "Ana chigai!! Ana chigai!!"
    > he thinks she mean big praise, great or wow
    > next day he go golf with japanese businessman
    > Japanese man get a hole in one!
    > dad pal scream "Ana chigai!" to praise him
    > Japanese man turn to him, looking confused
    >
    > "What you mean, wrong hole?"
    
      

    Your flash drive: "Ana chigai!"

  • Sigurd Felix Wolfgang Atreides

    Such a weird mishmash of German, Latin and Greek, although Felix is extremely common in Germany too. Sigurd isn't though, that's some old germanic kinda name, like Æthelwulf in the anglosphere.

  • That is extremely cool and I don't doubt your expertise in the slightest. Was only commenting about that anoxic conditions alone wouldn't necessarily preserve the bog mummies, but that the acidic conditions and tannins are likely more important.

  • Well the human gut is anoxic too, so that shouldn't be a problem for the gut-bacteria in that log and in the bog mummies. I think it way more likely that the sphagnan and the other tannins in peat-bog-water conserved this as well as the bog bodies.

  • Meh, our esoterics are basically religious anarchists or spiritual hippies. They still fall into all the trapping of religion without the "organized" part of "organized religion".

  • Baboons gang up on leopards all the time, our genetic line has been ganging up on threads since we weren't even apes but monkeys. It's the age old tradition of forming a mob and curbstomping everything that brought us to the top of the food chain.

  • Rights are what a community agrees on that they should have. I'm happy my community has agreed that owning guns is a priviledge, not a right. There is no sufficient reason owning guns should be a right, so I can be completely in favour of rights and freedoms without including any right to own guns.

  • Not necessarily. And I don't think you meant it like this could be read.

    You can absolutely be pro something but recognize the downsides of it. You can be pro vaxxination, but be critical of how the government handles rollout, you can be pro EV but still remain convinced that the resources needed for batteries are (at the moment) produced using child labor and causing environmental destruction. Constructive critique is valid and necessary.

    People don't need to be fanboys, sitting on the fence is completely okay in regards to many topics.

    What I think you meant to criticise (please correct me if I'm wrong) is that lots of invalid critique and unreasonable opposition hides behind a thin veneer of "I'm actually in favor of {x}" and yes, we're all sick of it.