Engywook @ Engywuck @lemm.ee

I have no sympathy for GAFAM, but Mozilla sucks even more and you can't con

---

Read more

Posts

6

Comments

1,189

Joined

2 yr. ago

Many chromium browser have built-in adblockers and some of them are on-par with uBO. These are not extensions, so Google can't really do anything about them. Not worried in the slightest.

As I said, I mainly care about adblocking. Shields (Brave's adblocker) does an amazing job and doesn't depend on MV2 or MV3 (it's not an extension).

That's precisely one of the reasons I use it.

I only care about adblocking, so ControlD+Brave for me.

If you are from EU, I think it's forbidden to disallow exporting your data. I may be wrong.

Left them 4 years ago (after 20ish years), so...

What a creepy title, jeez.

MILF

YOLO

YMMV

OTOH

ETC

LOL, I'm boycotting Amazon since 2007, at least. Good luck!

If I remember correctly, Thunderbird isn't a Mozilla product anymore but it's maintained by the community. Mozilla just hosts it.

Add some better CEO/management to the mix, but yes.

Amazing.

Well, IIRC, TB isn't developed by Mozilla. They just "host" it.

No. Research for yourself or just blame Google and be happy.

I'd say that Chromium has a monopoly thanks to Mozilla.

These are browser engines, or at least software for rendering HTML but not necessarily the actual browser.

That's why this post makes no sense. There's no "evil" rendering engine. They should be judged by technical parameters.

That was a shitty reply with paternalistic attitude. The kind of fundamentalist attitude which alienates people from some communities. I use Linux and FOSS exclusively since decades, but if I happily fire up a VM to use some CS software that is only available for Windows, if that allows me to do my job better or faster. I don't need some stranger in the internet telling me that my workflow is broken because of "principles". These people better stay in my block list.

My account, my rules.

Done

Nobody asked your opinion. Bye to you too.