Endymion_Mallorn @ Endymion_Mallorn @kbin.melroy.org

Just a nerd who migrated from kbin(dot)social.

---

Read more

Posts

3

Comments

247

Joined

8 mo. ago

My NDS plug (and 3DS plug) stays in so firmly I've had to tug on it. Are we living in Bizarro-land from each other?

Let me guess - that way you're a mile away, and you have their shoes?

Lucky you. My experience has been the opposite.

Find me a USB-C that doesn't fall out. Every Micro-USB male plug that I've used has those two notches at the bottom that hold it in place. Every device I've had with USB-C, I have to treat it like it's super delicate while it charges.

The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms, the Giant Claw, The Horror of Party Beach, Them!, The Deadly Mantis and others would like a word about how their death counts and destruction are overlooked. So would the various American Godzilla movies, and Cloverfield.

The biggest difference is that the Army moves fast in US movies, where the JSDF is always waiting until the last possible moment.

That's correct, and the fact that Apple caved from the 8-Pin Lightning connector to USB-C is one of many, many reasons I won't be buying anything Apple again, even second-hand. The lack of a headphone jack is just one more thing that made me certain of it. If I could find a micro-USB device with a headphone jack that serves as a phone, a pager, a calculator, and an audio (various formats - MP2A,MP3A,MP4A,WAV, FLAC, OGG, WMA, etc.) player, all my problems would be solved. I have looked into featurephones, I think I'm going to be moving in that direction next time I upgrade.

I don't see what the issue is here. They don't want to be treated as a utility, but if they stay in New York, they'll be regulated as a utility. They've dealt with it as a phone provider, and choose not to engage in the regulatory environment being put in front of them. It's a totally reasonable choice for a business to walk away from a market if the cost of doing business would exceed the profits made.

I don't see how it's that quick an escalation. When someone doesn't or can't pay assessed fines, they go to jail. That's just how our wealth-based justice system works. When those fines involve children, CFS/DYFS needs to get involved.

I'm also responding to the question of "ultimate refusal", that's not just one or two screwups, or referring anyone with a willingness to try and find a way to reduce the fines with community service time (like say, chaperoning a field trip for their kids' classes) or the like. This is working against someone who's planted their feet, refuses to be a good parent to their child, and refuses to pay in to the system which will inevitably have to try and clean up the mess they're making of this tiny human's social and mental state when that minor becomes a person.

If the parents legitimately can't pay, then have them volunteer for the school. Let them see the consequences of their actions first-hand.

Multiple times. But no, I mean, when I saw the OP, all I could think of was "Jamie wants big boom."

Okay. so there's two of us who thought of Mythbusters upon seeing this.

Jamie want big boom!

Same as with any fine related to a kid. CFS gets involved, and the parents get jailed.

I was a teacher for a few years but tapped out and got back into the real world. My partner is a teacher. My ex is a tutor and former teacher.

Based on those experiences - cellphones are a menace. They always were, and always will be. Technology in the classroom should rarely be in the hands of students, and if it is in their hands, it should be made such that it cannot access the internet or anything non-educational. That's an absolute.

More importantly, we need parents to enforce these rules as moral bases. We shouldn't be distracting babies with screens when they're yelling and screaming. We shouldn't be letting kids have 'screen time' without clear supervision or with any form of internet content. We need parents who actually do the job, because as we become more reliant on technology it's gone from the TV Babysitter to the TV Parent to the Internet Parent. That's no way to live, to be educated, or to understand the world around you.

These statewide and district-wide bans and solutions are important. But what I think would be more important would be for there to be fines. Take it easy on the kid, but any time they're distracted by their phone or other electronic device, that's a $100 ticket issued to the parents. Misuse of school property?$500 ticket, and a bill for the cost of the device since it potentially has to be scrapped. I bet that if we did that, parents would send far, far fewer phones to school and make sure the kids only use school computers for school.

Thanks to Mint's updates... about 10 minutes.

Murphy's lackey is going to screw over the customers on these golf courses, I'm sure of it.

Nah, everything is binary. We just view it through false lenses because the switches got too tiny and people got too dumb.

Yes, but what about the Olympic and Britannic?

They try to lock down again, there's probably going to be some serious shit.