Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)EM
Posts
0
Comments
86
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Regressives want the personal freedom to harass hurt and kill who they want. That's what they're talking about. They feel the walls finally around them saying they can't. So they lash out, at anything.

    They are dangerous feral animals

  • The example of the mobile phone is pretty wrong. The first mobile cost about $4000 and the cheapest today still costs around $25. The original cars cost 30k adjusted for inflation with the cheapest today costing around 15.

    Once again. It's always held true. Outside factors could make it take longer but ultimately you said never. Which basically makes your original statement near impossible.

  • Logically the refutation is kind of easy. Your prediction hinges on two things. A predicate that technology will never get better or cheaper.

    Both of those things happen all the time as such, the refutation is simple.

    Points to our entire technological history

  • The modularity is important. You might not care about cost to replace, and affordability. Plenty of people do.

    What's weirder is you compare it to a MacBook Pro with 400, when much much faster is available elsewhere. It's not an apples to apples comparison.

  • rule

    Jump
  • Harm reduction is fine, but faced with a view going that way, why not use ranked choice. First choice might be I've cream, but if you can't do that, perhaps going somewhere else works.