Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)EH
Posts
1
Comments
1,951
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Yes, they are. But that does not make it better that there is no bin. I have been in a situation with no bin but trash that can not simply be carried (disgusting liquid) and had to dump it. That is extremely rare for me, I usually pick up others trash. But there are situations where you simply need a bin, no matter how green you are.

  • Does "older games" only mean the initial public release? So world of Warcraft, Dota 2, Minecraft... all those games that are constantly updated etc. too?

    Because that would be a really useless statistic. Many games are not a one time release and done thing anymore. They evolve over time. The games I listed have large player bases.

  • Not sure how you come to such conclusions. 18 % flat out disagree that climate change happens. Of the 82 % there will be a lot that disregard human influence. 57 % see it as a pressing matter instead of nothing or a minor inconvenience.

  • If there is enough pressure to make neutrons, we are well past making iron. They are pushed into the core regardless if they are bound to the classical orbits or in a plasma state, the latter at these pressures really does not mean anything anymore, the electrons can freely move in any case.

    The + charge of the nucleus is accelerated to the electrons, so it first gets faster, then just as much slower again when it flies past them.

  • 6 % of 80-something million is 5 million. The poll did not ask babies, they are already excluded there. The subset of the total population will then be smaller too, but really not much changes: A whole fucking lot would still but it. Millions. That is the big problem.

  • Electron repulsion is irrelevant compared to the energies needed for fusion. It only takes a few eV to throw electrons out orbit, since they are so far away from the nucleus. On the other hand, a nucleus itself would be attracted to these electrons equally much approaching them and passing them, resulting in a net 0 effect.

    The electrostatic effect of the 2 positive nuclei repelling is WAY larger due to the extremely small distances needed for fusion.