Eheran @ Eheran @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

1,951

Joined

2 yr. ago

Nothing is good for lungs, that's the point. Workers inhaling stuff for 8 hours, 5 days a week for 30+ years with 20 % having respiratory symptoms is the kind of "dangerous" we are taking about here. What is NOT problematic at such exposure?

Let us just note that this would be impossible when using it to write something.

Hardly anything is less problematic than graphite. No idea why you think that is an issue.

Proof that high resolutions do not exist? Huh, did not see that one coming.

Proof for what is the question.

It is like comparing electricity use of trucks and ships to trains to make them look good/bad. They run on fuel, not electricity, that number is simply useless.

Steel, cement and chemicals, as per the article.

Those industries are not that electricity intensive, with the only real exception being the electric arc furnace, which are "only" for secondary steel production. You would need to look at the overall energy consumption, as they mostly need heat and chemical energy, not electricity.

There is really no need to make up absurd numbers when the real number is already way too high.

Sorry for expecting more than 1 MP.

Yes, that is not poster resolution. The marvel logo is super pixelated. That is surely not how they released it?

I hope the actual poster has more than 10 pixels.

Sounds like you have little to lose and little to win, but potentially a lot to win. So... Why not?

If you think that people in the USSR were better off you might want to read about their rights (or rather lack thereof), regardless of Russia, Ukraine etc. Human rights in the Soviet Union It is absolutely crazy how little rights they had, we could easily argue that a peasant in 800 was better off in terms of his rights. If we include the planned starvation of millions, then he was also better off in such basic necessities.

How about 3 fiddy?

What popups? Am I doing something wrong/right that I do not get those? What could you not do but now can?

How is that what you got from my comment? Monarchies failed all the time and people were miserable, like in any communist thing we had so far.

How do you feel about the other aggressive things China is doing? Like attacking boats with water cannons because they just claim an area? Or dumping sand somewhere to make an island to claim the area? Or actual fighting and deaths over territories with India?

I think we have already established your view on Taiwan, which is hardly compatible with the general population.

Because the examples where the capitalist were not in control anymore were so good for the average worker?

Replacing a system that fails in one country but essentially nowhere else on the planet, despite being dominant, with a system that failed every single time is not exactly reasonable.

What does that have to do with actual soldiers doing the dirty work? And isn't he also replacing people left and right for the same reason?