Canada does have an unusually small number of houses, relative to its population size, as compared to most other countries. It may be true that we still have a sufficient number of houses to house everyone, but not unlike farming, houses can burn down, get hit by tornadoes, etc. and having an oversupply can also be a social good to ensure that people can still find a roof over their head when things go wrong.
And how is subsidizing someone else to build new farms to compete with me, not still just taking a portion of what I have, and giving it to someone else, but with extra steps that wastes time and resources?
It is a social good to have an overproduction of food to ensure that there is still sufficient food available when things go wrong. A single farm is incentivized to leave people to starve, so it is a given that expansion would be needed when moving away from that single farm in an effort to better serve the population.
And even if I don’t, we don’t actually need more farms.
But since you are now operating more farms than needed you've ended up with a flood of product. It costs extreme amounts of money to operate a farm, so you are going to be forced to liquidate that product to pay your bills. The consumer won't pay top dollar for food they don't need, so you are going to be forced to sell it for pennies on the dollar. And now food is cheap.
Then they should not make (what would then be) a legally binding promise.
Yes, if this is what the electorate wants, they should present the contract and get the candidate to sign it before election night.
I think you'll find the electorate doesn't actually want that, though. The incumbent maybe has sufficient information to present an election promise, assuming they can implement it in the first few days before the state of the world has moved on, but the other candidates most certainly do not. Why would you want a politician making decisions before they have information? That would be downright stupid.
We didn't, though. A commodity is interchangeable. Housing is not interchangeable. A house in Iqaluit cannot meaningfully replace a house in Toronto. If housing were made a commodity it is likely we wouldn't have the problems we have, but since we have never done such a thing...
The person who works in the warehouse to pick the items off the shelf when an order is placed. You know, the job you were conned into doing when you enter one of these warehouse-style stores that we are talking about.
It wasn't always that way. Historically, you would place your order at the front counter and a diligent worker would work behind the scenes to gather your request. Some businesses still operate this way, to be sure, but it has largely gone the way of the dodo. It is generally more profitable when the customer does the work.
I see you've never worked with flour before. Once it meets water there is no turning back.
Granted, if you catch it earlier, wheat berries aren't that hard to run through the dryer, assuming you accept the environmental and financial cost. Get into beans, though... Good luck.
If you just mean something like Apples, which don't need to be dry, who doesn't already wash it before consumption already?
I don’t appreciate stores trying to force me to do the cashier’s job.
But you don't mind the fact that they have you doing the warehouse picker's job?
I also don’t appreciate them trying to pull the rug out from under the economy. If there’s one thing my country does not need, it’s millions more homeless people.
And maybe the first millions wouldn't be homeless if you weren't so keen to take their warehouse picking jobs. Once upon a time it was a respectable profession. Why do you care so little about them?
Perhaps you mean "the math"? That is an American colloquialism used to refer to one calculation or small set of calculations. But we are talking about "math", not "the math". Again, "math" is short for mathematics. It is already plural.
Attempting to pluralize something that is already in its plural form is nonsensical. Do they not teach your "childrens", which is what I assume you call them, that in school?
Canada strives for all of its words to be proper. Math is short for mathematics. Appending an 's' leaves you with mathematicies and that's not what is meant, nor is it a word found in the Canadian lexicon.
the only thing that the industry needs to do to reduce pesticide residue is to just spray the produce with water.
Water is often the enemy you are applying the pesticide to combat; a practice known as desiccation. Granted, it seems everyone's favourite desiccant is no longer on the table for modification here.
Canada does have an unusually small number of houses, relative to its population size, as compared to most other countries. It may be true that we still have a sufficient number of houses to house everyone, but not unlike farming, houses can burn down, get hit by tornadoes, etc. and having an oversupply can also be a social good to ensure that people can still find a roof over their head when things go wrong.