Eezyville @ Eezyville @sh.itjust.works

I'll do this later...

---

Read more

Posts

46

Comments

643

Joined

2 yr. ago

Personally I don't give a shit about Musk. I don't care about any celebrities but I try to not hate any of them because that's way too much attention I'm giving to someone who is so insignificant to me. I'm just always aware of them from being on these social media sites because there's always a legion of fans and haters. Maybe I'm really just complaining about social media and wish we were in the time of MySpace. Things were simple then and the internet was wild and untamed.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't. People will find a reason to hate him.

That's a bad comparison. Yelling "fire" in a crowd to induce a panic is illegal and can lead to arrest. But that happens after you actually yell "fire" not before you might yell "fire". In your example you say ban yelling "fire" when inducing a panic is already banned. Do you want people banned because of pre-crime?

If what these accounts said was so dangerous then why didn't the government go after the operators of the accounts and arrest them? Instead they tried to silence them by banning them from Twitter. That would only bring more validity to what these accounts were saying if the government has to tell foreign companies to silence them instead of challenging their speech.

All those downvotes you're getting shows me that Lemmy is exactly like Reddit. Hivemind

We live to resist this oppression. Keep fighting brother!

Can't wait for Codeberge to figure out federation on Activity Pub. Then other groups of people can host their own instance while we slowly move away from centralized repo hosts.

The circle of AI

In this situation it would be classified as "Exigent Circumstances" and would give the police the right to enter private property without a search warrant or consent. That is because they can witness someone committing a crime. They would also be justified in using enough force to stop the crime from happening. I don't think they would be justified if they pulled out a gun, killed the perpetrator, and the perpetrator didn't have any weapons nor acted like they had one. They should go for non-lethal means first.

Facebook Messenger

My man. Go touch some grass. This place is no good. Not trying to insult you but it's for your mental health. These Redditors aren't worth it.

They're already doing that here in Ohio

This AI is hallucinating on some strong digital shrooms.

The problem is neither of us know what the true capabilities between the two nations are. Obviously they keep that intel under lock and key and if either of us had inside knowledge and revealed that knowledge then the respective nation would come after us.

I find these discussions on military capabilities to be pointless on Lemmy and Reddit. No one actually knows and if they did they can't say anything, there are too many people pretending to know what they're talking about speaking with authority but are making everything up, and though you can gain some insight on a nations capabilities by paying attention to news and media that focus on military technology no one actually cites those sources.

The Cherokee Nation. I've actually done some work in the drone industry and I know that the Cherokee Nation build drones for Lockheed Martin. The Native Americans are not the American government so they can bypass some tariffs and other legal issues the US government faces with regards to import export. We still don't have the infrastructure of China. We don't have the manufacturing base in this area that China has. Don't look down on China, they are innovative in drone technology. The companies in the US needs to get a innovative as the Chinese one but for that we need the same support from our government that the Chinese get to create the missing infrastructure that China has.

We don't have a lead in software and for an Unmanned Aerial System we need hardware with the software.

You know they can't include Chinese innovations if they want to single out China and make them the enemy. The fact is the Chinese own 90% of the consumer drone market because of their innovations. I assume they have good military drones too.

All the people who down voted you, I bet not a single one would go fight in the war they want America to be a party to.

We aren't gonna produce those drones. We don't have the infrastructure, China does. When we decided to ban Chinese made drones there were no one capable of replacing them in the consumer space. The ones left in the Blue UAS program pulled out of consumer markets. DJI dominates and that's just in the consumer market. I wouldn't sell the Chinese short in military drones.

NFTs anyone?