∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/its, she/her, fae/faer, love/loves, null/void, des/pair, none/use name] @ Edie @lemmy.ml

AuDHD cat. If you don't know which pronoun to use, go for it/its.

---

Read more

Posts

0

Comments

237

Joined

1 yr. ago

I think so. Nutomic is still a dev

They... dont. Pointing out why the war happened, and wanting the war to end: understanding that the only way for the war to end being through negotiations where Ukraine gives up things, and therefore saying that Ukraine should negotiate and end the war, can to some look like defending Russia, it is not.

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/21641836/12770035

tldr: Nutomic (one of the main developers of lemmy, and therefore an admin on lemmy.ml) was transphobic.

seemed quite happy to ban a user for very minor criticisms of the Orange Cunt

Which user?

the instance mods also mod a looot of communism and CCP related communities

Could it be that they are communists, leftists (i.e. anti-capitalist)... as they declared themselves?

Toying with making an account and posting a certain controversial image just to see what happens

Since you are being vauge, I'm not sure which one you are talking about. But either you will be banned, probably for racism (implying a chinese person is yellow), or you will be given books and links to read/watch up on.

I can't see cm0002's post here from lemmy.ml, but I want to point out that nutomic was banned from hexbear because of those statements.

Edit: cm0002 has responded to me with bullshit, I don't care.

I hope that one day you will understand Politzer, or well, idealism and materialism, even if it isn't through reading Politzer. Then you will understand why I said you are doing idealism.

I think the private ownership is coming from this:

Also, as a defender of the idea of division of powers, I honestly prefer when executive powers at all levels are distinct from planning/legislative. So if it does really “necessarily trend towards Communism” I’d hope whatever replaces the private owners does the same job of assuming responsibility if/when unfairness happens as it did before the fall. I’d hate if the same level of scrutiny and legal/social pressure wasn’t placed against the ones replacing them.

The liberal idea of... meritocracy, ah, not that's maybe part of it, but... I know what I want to say, but I forget what it is called, hopefully you can guess it.

rather than try to theorycraft an ideal society

I was about to say, this person seems to be very idealist, combined with some wrong ideas (e.g. about private ownership for some reason being better?), it leads to some very wonky stuff

How do you personally reckon we can make it to your prefered organization of society,

I think

If you aren't one of these, then what are you? I guess there still is reactionary, off to the right of the image.

Do you really need to read volumes of theory to grasp what is fundamentally a rather straightforward concept?

Yes! The three volumes on shitting are essential reads. (/s)

Political theory. Like this intro reading list

You are already living in a class war. You are below the poverty line because of it.

Two spaces at the end of a line
Makes a new line

So I checked it out... never directly states where the data is from ("PRC state media and data", "party documents and data reportedly obtained from local public security bureaus in Xinjiang", it continues to be this vague never specific throughout), most of the dates end in 2021/2022 (for the latter e.g. "the last date for which authorities have issued such reports", so that doesn't show it hasn't ended in 2021)

The closest thing you have in there is

the continued elevated number of indictments in 2022 suggests that the campaign continues

Are there other, better, sources?

I think Lumelore is starting of at anti-communism, and working her way from there. It leads to some weird stuff like this.

It says that anyone could propose a candidate, and that the person elected in that specific election wasn't part of the [Communist] Party, making it somewhat likely they weren't a communist.

But a better question, is why is it important that they can vote for non-communists? What else should they vote for? Fascists? Liberals that wish to destroy the Soviet system and institute capitalism, thereby making the lives of the vast majority of people worse? Chapter XVII goes over this to some extent, but I of course do recommend reading the entire book.

No mention of being able to vote for non-communists

?????

Anybody present had the right to propose a candidate, the one who was elected was not personally a member of the Party