EatYouWell @ EatYouWell @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

731

Joined

2 yr. ago

Why? Starbucks doesn't limit their coffee and it has the same caffeine per ml as this drink.

I don't think they need to change anything, honestly. They clearly state the amount of caffeine it contains, and that amount is safe for healthy adults.

So, any hotel is liable if a guest drinks too much coffee from the breakfast buffet?

The drink is perfectly safe for people without health issues that make caffeine unsafe.

It's not a dangerous drink for the majority of the population. Dude had known medical issues that caffeine can cause issues with, and drank an unreasonable amount of it.

You obviously haven't ever worked in IT.

Also, a cup of coffee is about 4x smaller than a 30oz drink.

Reddit does, they just don't care

Seconded

Isn't this already an established fact?

You can go ahead and prepay for the service, even if it's just cremation and stuffing your bone dust in a cardboard box.

That way your family doesn't have to both grieve and figure out arrangements.

It really is a good idea. My wife's grandma did it in the 80s, so when she died all the family had to do was pick what food they wanted at the wake. Prices only increase, so the earlier you buy the more you save.

Make a will for the edit part

At a certain point in life you'll usually have 6 family members who have died, and if you live even longer you'll start having friends die.

I'll have to get the name of the specific murder porn show from my wife, but there's one where they go into detail about how they find a suspect with DNA by finding people with a close enough match to narrow down the family tree and get super close to the actual person, if not the exact person.

I guarantee the original contract said the rates are subject to change without notice. Plus, raising the prices will definitely increase CS call volume more than sending out notices.

You'd think that, but you know those "don't remove or warranty is void" stickers on stuff? They're illegal.

But at least the second one isn't allowed anymore. I'm not sure if the ACA addresses the first point.

Building a massive collection of DNA is a really good thing from a research standpoint. Plus, it's helping solve a bunch of murder cold cases.

No, but that doesn't mean it's legally enforceable.

You can't sign away negligence in a contract.

Do you think that trees don't require money to upkeep?

Plus, they fuck up any infrastructure they're around, so that money is going to contractors anyway.

Not arguing that at all. But vans really aren't much better from a fuel economy standpoint.