EatATaco @ EatATaco @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

2,804

Joined

2 yr. ago

Wat? It's literally the definition of censorship. I think you mean to say censorship is not, in and of itself, bad.

Do you think the government has complete control over your speech now? Do you think you are absolutely free to say whatever you want? I don't even know where to start with someone who doesn't understand that it doesn't have to be one or the other despite, right now, it not being one or the other.

The letter said it has all the hallmarks of Russian propaganda, not that it was. This is certainly something that certainly has not been disproven by a long shot.

It's funny how often people need to turn to blatant disinformation in order in a desperate attempt to both sides the issue of disinformation. Quite telling, in fact.

I'm firmly in the wait for reviews and price drop of any new game. But anno 1800 was an amazing game, so I do have high hopes for this.

I have kids and sometimes it's important thing from a doctor/school/whatever that I want to get.

However, I'm lucky that my cell phone area code is nowhere near where I live, so if I see an area code near my phones area code, I know it's almost certainly spam. If I get a call from near where I live, its almost certainly legitimate.

Because we jumped to the conclusion that he is being arrested for providing privacy, and thus our internal biases make it difficult for us to quit that idea. Much easier to force the facts to fit the conclusion than it is to reevaluate the conclusion.

which is why you sound like a creep,

Yeah this is just too bizarre to continue. I'm done.

Are you comparing sexual assault to having your photo taken? Yikes.

Remember, this happenes yesterday. If it's gone in a few days, you might not remember it in 4 years either. I've provided the proof it did, in fact, happen. Which I remember. Time will tell.

And this literally happened yesterday. If it's gone within a week, it would be about the same.

This is a much more honest answer, one that I also agree with.

"It's expensive, but I still want everything, so I pirated it. Seems pretty justified."

Look, I've pirated a ton in my life, but this whole "This is actually a noble pursuit" is such a load of fucking horse shit. We want something and don't want to pay the price that is required to get it, so we take it. The best part is "preserving" it, because we all know that when this guy is done playing, it will be deleted and he'll never think of it again.

Barron Trump has been 100% unmentioned by anyone

Maybe you're young and don't remember, but it was absolutely an issue. My recollection is that it was quickly squashed, but it certainly was not "100% unmentioned by anyone."

https://www.thewrap.com/white-house-says-it-fully-expects-the-press-to-leave-barron-trump-alone/

This sounds awfully close to "Dijon mustard on a burger! How out of touch can you be!" Levels of ridiculousness.

Appreciate it. But, make no mistake, I'm normally the chud who belongs on a block list. lol

Please and thank you don’t violate barriers.

Sure they do. Some people don't like to talk to other people, and don't want to have to say these things. Hell, sometimes I say please and thank you to people I don't even like, even resisting the urge to be rude because i don't like them, but because I realize it's the right thing to do. You're basically agreeing with my point here, you are just putting the threshold of what constitutes a violation of a barrier at a different point, and arbitrarily putting some line at "space." That invasion of barriers is okay, telling people that they should say please and thank you, but others are not. The argument is really a matter of degrees.

Let's be clear, we both agree that you don't always put aside your own wants and needs to please another person. But sometimes it just makes sense to do so.

So, you’d tell your child that “yes, you have autonomy in this, but your feelings regarding your need for personal space matter less than your grandmother’s want for a hug” is what I’m gathering?

No, it's not what you are gathering. That's just how you are twisting it because you are trying to win the argument rather than come to some mutually agreeable position. I'm explaining to them that sometimes you should put your own minor issues aside for other people. I feel like you are arguing the opposite - which is why you are putting this in my mouth - and saying that your desires and wants should always be put above other people's desires and wants.

Do you educate your mother on the child’s wants/needs?

Absolutely. Quite frequently. Relatively, way more than having to guide my child in towards the right answer.

There’s a reason why people are educated that, as far as physical touch is concerned, nobody else’s feelings should be taken into account.

I wish the world was this black and white and that you should always put your selfish desires above everyone else's needs and desires. Unfortunately, the world we live in is an incredibly grey place where most things are a matter of degrees rather than a simply "yes/no" and sometimes the answer is to put others first.

Like, for instance, if they don't want to briefly hug grandmom simply because they don't like the way she smells. . .well, sometimes old people smell different, and if we love them we want to show that love to them in their love language. If that's by a huge, then we should probably strongly consider doing it. If they don't want to hug grandma because they have some sensory issues and any touch is bothersome, so be it that's completely different and I know my mother would understand that. But the black and white answer to this question is wrong either way.

People have identified that exact thinking pattern in why they didn’t report sexual assault from a family member. Because they weren’t taught how to properly say no and why the right to refuse touch is important, it was that much easier to abuse them.

I assure you my children are taught what is and what is not appropriate touching, and we have a very open relationship where we discuss things all the time. But I feel like this is a "humans are bad at assessing risk" type of thing. . .like you're so afraid of the rare instance where a child abused, that you are trading that outside risk for the near sure risk of them not developing good relationships with other people, which is a powerful skill.

When have I blatantly misrepresented your position? Let alone multiple times?

What about saying please and thank you? If my kid doesn't want to show that kind of respect to those around them, should be like "good job setting boundaries" or should I point out how this will hurt them and upset other people?

I would never force my children to do anything they don't want to (well, I guess I can't say that because, well, anyone who is a parent knows thats just a pipe dream lol). More to the point, I'm also not forcing the OP. They asked for advice, and I gave it. And yes if my kids didn't want to hug my mother, I would probably explain to them that this is likely to hurt them because of tension it might create in their relationship, physical affection is generally a positive thing for bother parties, and how it also hurts their grandmother.

Who cares, just fucking do it anyway.

I didn't say no one cares, I said it would be something i tell my children to suck up and do anyway. Just like cleaning their rooms, brushing their teeth, or dressing nicely: all things that will help them out, and be pleasant for those around them, even if they don't particularly like them.

But apparently we've gotten to the point where im just being misrepresented. If you don't want to see my position, I can't force you to.

but to just discount OPs feelings about it is FAR more rude than declining to be in a photo.

I didn't discount them. They asked for advice, which included not having to explain themselves, and I gave it to them.

And I feel pretty justified in my position if the counter position requires comparing getting your picture taken to sucking a dick.