You made it obvious before that you understood my implicit question...and you're trying to play it off as if you have to "assume." Lol
South Korea, New Zealand, England, Australia, and Canada.
Still avoiding where to currently live. Lol hilarious. And to live in South Korea and think America is bad when it comes to celebrity worship exposes a special type of ignorance about the us.
simple or a troll.
Definitely not a troll. Maybe simple. But at least I'm not dishonest, like some people still posting here.
So confident in your position that even after being called out for not offering up where you live, you still very vocally dodge the question.
Also, if you think the us is the worst in the world for celebrity worship, you aren't well versed in the topic at all. Many countries in Asia are far more obsessed with their celebrities than the us.
You just quoted me saying "I believe it's true" but now you are saying that I'm not self reflecting because I noted that another also believes it to be true and they originally stated it.
You keep accusing me of acting in bad faith, but I'm beginning to think that this is maybe a projection.
They've been calling it for basically the last whole war.
In fact, it's been done pretty masterfully by not making one huge step, but small steps where no single one would force him to do something, but just over time each small step eventually gets to the point where he said he would have to do something...and hasn't.
Of course you don't list where "here" is. I'm willing to bet that not only do they care about celebrities about the same as Americans, but also that many of those celebrities they care about are Americans.
Im not one to say you can never speak ill of the dead, but man to bash someone right after they die among a group of people that likely includes his friends requires a special type of social cluelessness, or straight up being a bad person.
If she did endorse Trump, the harassment would have been a magnitude less. Individuals will be individuals, but the leaders of one group are denouncing harassment and violence while the leaders of the other group are inciting it.
I get the logic of this, but you feel pretty confident that it's true. Do you have the numbers to back this up? I believe it is true, but that's not based on any actual evidence.
There are people who are definitely going to go out and vote for Harris. There are people who are definitely going to go out and vote for Trump.
The debate isn't for these people. It's for the people who are shockingly on the fence about who to vote for, and those who may not vote at all.
The more you get trump on screen being easily manipulated by Harris, the more you make him look weak which will make some of his less ardent supporters less likely to vote, while also convincing others then Harris is the more sane choice.
Okay, but is the person still an officer? I mean, it is in the name. The way I see it, as a layman, it is kind of hard to ding the author for getting this wrong when they are technically correct and a laymen would consider them an officer, and the only real complaint is that colloquially military members don't refer to them as officers.
When I was leaving college a quarter of a century ago I briefly considered going into game dev...even back then everyone said it was low paid and gruelling work, so I passed.
Except if you read the article, that's not at all what is happening here. The title is just click bait garbage, just like trump is dishonesty garbage too.
Admitting to arguing in bad faith while calling me a troll. Should have known it was a projection.