has she ever harmed a human being, or let a human being become harmed due to inaction?
does she obey orders given by humans that do not lead to humans getting harmed?
does she protect her own existence, unless it would cause harm to human beings?
if you answered "yes" to all of the above, she seems to follows asimovs laws of robotics and thus might be a robot, if you answered "no" to any of the questions:
do you really think companies would put safety meassures into products unless they are forced to?!
i am torn on hl2, on my first play through it really felt like the best game ever, and iam sure people who pick it up today will have a great time, but replaying it... definitely lot's of stuff that was really cool the first time around, that loses it's impact after that.
"Domain Driven Design" by Eric Evans, aka the blue book. It's very dense however and very object oriented, but concepts apply even if you dont work with object oriented languages, you might have to do more footwork to get from a domain model to services that adhere to the model.
"Head first Software Architecture" might be an easier on ramp and touches on simmiliar concepts.
yes, this is exactly what you have to think about. the left example even aknowledges that deadlines for "tasks" might be different from deadlines for "payments", which suggests that the abstraction is not "clean".
the gyro can be set to "joystick" and "as joystick" one of those allows you to limit the gyro to rotation around an axis, that should give you what you want.
you can at the very least map analog sticks to the decks gyro, i played one of the Dirt games like that. Should be great for arcade style games like sonic all stars racing or mario kart.
games that offer the option to self-host dedicated servers often have a central "master" server. dedicated servers advertise themselfs to the master server and clients can ask the master server for a list of servers. might be that the comment was talking about a server like that.
the master server for ut 2k4 that was run by epic had to be replaced by one from the community for two years now for example.
"logs show a reoccuring error in layer 8 everytime a subset of users engages with the system, reassigning this to the service desk to gather more information."
i've read that on real ticket, i've laughed about it. it also makes me glad that i don't do customer support, i don't have the patience to keep explaining the same people that they keep doing something wrong and i lack the diplomacy skills to engage with devs that believe to be infallible and pretend that bug reports are personal insults against them.
Keeping focus for a whole movie can be tough yeah.
it works way better if i've taken my meds( huge suprise, i know :D) and even better in a cinema opposed to watching on tv or phone, i guess the big screen and proper sound system are just more engaging and there is less distraction.
If i watch a movie at home i often do it by watching it in like 30 minute episodes, because otherwise i end up rewinding multiple times anyway and that's frustrating, so i rather take a break from it if my brain won't cooperate.
for that it would have to be priced somewhere in the ball park of the steam deck and offer more compute power than that. i don't see this from sony, i expect either a very expensive device marketed as as "premium" handheld or an iteration on their PlayStation Portal(?) streaming handheld.
because no one follows the damn guide and "scrum" is done so managers can claim the company can work "agile", because customers dont want "not agile", customers also dont want to participate in the way it would be necessary for a project thats supposed to follow the scrum guide. that also sounded good for people looking for a new job so hr wants to put that into job descriptions and now everything is scrum and agile and i still have to sneak in refactorings or have to fight to get time to work on our fricking ci pipeline or need to conspire with QA to get them time to work on test automation, because screw the notion that decisions should be done by the people doing the work.
screw "scrum", and the word "agile" should never have been taught to anyone claiming to be a "manager", we don't need managers we need people helping us getting the tools we need and trust that what we do, we do to deliver better solutions and helping us to fascilate constructive exchanges with customers.
i don't get the nihilism angle.
it seems to be all about selffulfilment and pushing oneself to see what one is capable of. simmiliar to triathlets, race car drivers or climbers.
data-plumbing-for-corporations tends to be able to be done in a way that's easily testable, but also most people get paid to bolt on new shit onto old shit and spending time on "done" code is discouraged so once they fall behind on writing tests while developing the new shit those tests will never be written.
and bad developers that won't write tests no matter what actually do exist.
my problem is not with words changing there meaning its with words losing meaning.
rest api today means any api ontop of http where response bodies are json, but nothing more, we can't get much more general when talking about web apis than that, "rest" is almost meaningless and we don't have a new word describing APIs that adhere to the constraints of what restful meant, but those are a useful tool for building web applications that can easily be used by a web browser. no matter if you like fielding-rest-style-apis or not, you lost the ability to call them by a name and gained murky mumbo jumbo for it.
Rigor in definitions allows us to express a lot of complex things in a compact form. this allows us to treat "Cars" as something different than "Motorcycles" while both a motorized vehicles.
the same is true for REST-API and other API-Types, while all of them are just a means to allow services to exchange data, they tell us a lot about how this exchange happens and what to expect, but only if we use the words in a way that they represent the concept they were meant to represent. Otherwise we end up with meaningless buzz words like "rest", "agile", "scrum", "artificial intelligence" and so forth, instead of meaningful terms found in the jargon of other engineering disciplines like "magnetism", "gravity" or "motor".
i've only read about rust, but is there a way to influence those automatic implementations?
equality for example could be that somethings literally point to the same thing in memory, or it could be that two structs have only values that are equal to each other
has she ever harmed a human being, or let a human being become harmed due to inaction?
does she obey orders given by humans that do not lead to humans getting harmed?
does she protect her own existence, unless it would cause harm to human beings?
if you answered "yes" to all of the above, she seems to follows asimovs laws of robotics and thus might be a robot, if you answered "no" to any of the questions:
do you really think companies would put safety meassures into products unless they are forced to?!