Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)
Posts
2
Comments
628
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • What you end up doing is lumping people who are genuinely trying to reduce their consumption over time, with people who eat steak for every meal and kick puppies.

    I mean yeah? They are genuinely trying not to shove something in their mouth? How does that work?

  • Nah they’re pretty sapient

    Sapience is about applying wisdom, knowledge, intelligence. Babies are not sapient. Did you mean sentient?

    killing babies, unless it’s like baby Hitler doesn’t really serve any purpose (human pleasure is happiness, and maximisation of happiness is purpose)

    And yet if someone's only source of happiness in life was killing babies, I am sure you would be against that.

    I take it you’re anti-abortion too then?

    Abortion rights only relate tangentially to sapience and sentience. Even if the lump of cells inside a womb was sentient and sapient I would still be pro-choice, since abortion is about bodily autonomy. But think about why you would assume I am against abortion rights. Did that maybe make it easier to dismiss my entire point?

  • I don't need a reason, neither animals nor fetuses are sapient and Idgaf about them.

    Babies and small children aren't sapient either. So up to what age of a child would you say it is morally ok to cut their throat?