So if they were basically regurgitating Reddit already, does that mean they were using AI before it was cool? They might have just used the Amazon approach to AI (I.e., why use technology when we can throw a bunch of minimum workers at the problem).
Oh crap. I shouldn't have said there was a meeting.
Oh crap. I definitely shouldn't have said it was a secret.
Oh crap. I absolutely should not have said it was to reserve all our 2nm chip capacity.
Apple's issue was they timed it around a shift to USB-C chargers. Their argument was everyone already had plenty of chargers, but no one had the new ones (well, some people did obviously but they hadn't gotten it with a previous iPhone). That's why they cop so much flak over it.
I agree that conceptually it's a good change, they just picked a bastard of a time to do it (one could argue that was deliberate of course).
(I'll attempt this based on my understanding of both)
Pouring a cup of juice is something an adult needs to be involved with.
sudo is when you ask for permission to pour your own cup of juice. You ask an adult, they give you the cup and the juice, and then you're responsible for pouring it. If the adult isn't paying attention they may leave the fridge open for you to go back for more juice or another beverage, but otherwise you're limited to the amount of juice the adult has given you.
run0 is when the adult just gets you a cup of juice. You tell them what you want, they go and pour the juice, and just give you the cup with the juice in it. You never enter the kitchen, so you don't have access to the fridge, just your cup of juice.
To be fair, with no data to back it up, this is just an anecdote. So saying it's stereotyping ageist bullshit is a perfectly valid response to it. I just felt it fit the question quite well so I went and dug it up and shared it. If you feel differently, no stress!
The reality is going to be different to everyone, and it's as much a learned behaviour as anything else. It's not like collectively an entire generation got together and decided "it's 'no problem' now instead of 'you're welcome', okay?" Language evolves over time after all, and knowing why that happens and the actual causes for it are something that will require a lot more analysis than a couple of anecdotes from the internet.
Here's a response I've seen about this around the net for a while now that feels right.
--
"Actually, the “you’re welcome/no problem” issue is simply a linguistics misunderstanding. Older ppl tend to say “you’re welcome,” younger ppl tend to say “no problem.” This is because for older people the act of helping or assisting someone is seen as a task that is not expected of them, but is them doing extra, so it’s them saying, ‘I accept your thanks because I know I deserve it.”
“No problem, however, is used because younger people feel not only that helping or assisting someone is a given and expected but also that it should be stressed that your need for help was no burden to them (even if it was).”
“Basically, older people think help is a gift you give, younger people think help is a requirement.”
What's even wilder is if you look at the code of that package, all it does is include the is-odd package and then return !is-odd. And the is-odd package isn't much better, it does some basic checks on the input and then returns n % 2 === 1.
With the spike in popularity that D&D has seen lately is that not the natural evolution of old school muds? Even if you can't be together in person, video streaming over the internet has made it so the old text interface isn't needed anymore, you can just interact in real time without being in the same place.
MMORPGs aren't really the same. You don't have infinite capability to do whatever you want, you're typically playing an RPG with friends, and most of the endgame is structured around keeping people engaged through progressively difficult content.
As AI get better and is capable of actually writing some more engaging stories in real time I think you'll see some convergence here. Like for example, a game where two kingdoms are at war (a common enough trope in RPGs), but you go full stealth, work your way into the enemy castle and kill their king. What happens after that? Have they got a contingency for that? Will they double their efforts against you? Does their army fall apart? Do they surrender?
You couldn't pull that scenario off in an RPG these days without it being scripted, but in the future as the tech gets better you've got the possibility of building living breathing worlds that can react to the actions of the player (or players).
I quoted this a week or two ago for something else on here, and someone responded along the lines of you know they'd be trying to up that %, and they were 100% right.
I'd second afraid.org, have been using them for years and they've always been great. They also support dynamic DNS so if you're on a dynamic IP address you can have the address be updated automatically when your IP address does.
More relevant to the question, I'm pretty sure you can create NS records for a subdomain as well. I was experimenting once a few years back with a DNS tunnel service and was able to get the DNS side of it configured. Never did get the service itself working but it was more of a curiosity at the time so didn't spend a massive amount of time on it.
Did the KFC console ever actually release in the end? I remember when the specs got announced but I don't remember it ever actually going on sale or anyone getting one.
I have a sneaking suspicion when Google's AI eventually surfaces the story in a search they're probably not going to mention that fact though.