Drito @ Drito @sh.itjust.works

Posts

1

Comments

136

Joined

2 yr. ago

I'm sorry...You can blame Adobe for not porting their tools.

Give a look if Adobe provides their tools through the web.

Sometimes I want the file manager alongside the document I watch. Bspwm give them all the space available automatically.

I suggest to watch the package manager commands (probably 'apt --help') and use it for your packages. Package stuff is what I use the most in the terminal.

Vivarium

Please don't blame the lack of popularity, Vivarium works and its feature complete. The dev answers to the recent github issues.

i3-like WMs are underfeatured and Hyprland is less minimal than Vivarium.

If you want minimalism I advise you to use a tiling window manager instead of Gnome. If you want Wayland absolutely, use Hyprland.

Wings3D is less daunting for newbies. But you'll have to evaluate for the jewellery requirements.

And yes, Systemd does containers. :)

Are systemd duplicates such as containers and systemd-boot are better than the existing ?

Do you mean you want something like AUR but binary ? Fedora Silverblue can answers that question because their only packages are Flatpaks. MicroOs is similar.

I tried Nixos but it was overkill for my desktop usage. The learning time is a cost but also, on my old laptop, there is a noticeable performance loss comparing to arch. The benefits is not enough for my usecase. I prefer dealing with arch shitty updates.

The Xfce setup looks nice out of the box.

One year approximatively. But I elaborate a bit, I installed the minimal version, because I use bspwm. I had issues since the tty log in. Probably the xfce iso is OK.

The Retroarch blue GUI is terrible.

How the hell many people installs Void without problems. I tried two times and I always had wierds behaviours that makes me going back to arch.

Linux can work without big and bloated components. Companies funded development of components that are replaceable by simpler and easy to maintain ones.

The arch repos are enough for me except two softwares so I downloaded them as appimages. Appimages are enough for my small needs.

The glibc can be introduced by an Alpine fork, so Alpine can stay pure.

I tried Alpine for a desktop installation. The package manager has surprisingly decent package set. And the performance is the best I found, for some reason applications starts faster. But I had to stop the experience because websites thats includes widevine didn't work. Its sad to say, but many softwares relies on non-standard glibc shit. With glibc instead of musl Alpine can be simply the best distro. If musl is not faster that glibc I don't think glibc will make Alpine slower.