Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
19
Comments
697
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • The demo was a lot of fun, I'm looking forward to play to it once I've finished my latest acquisitions.

  • Problem is distance and autonomy.

    You can't really command drones that far, they are programed with the coordinates, then launched. And to go far, you need to have more fuel, thus a heavier drone, which in turn will be easier to detect and target for AA systems.

  • And that, my friend, is a fallacy fallacy (or Argumentum ad logicam if you wish to be posh as heck).

    Pointing out your opponent fallacies doesn't make yours valid. I'd also add that this is not a Stawman fallacy, as he does not attempt to replace your (absence of) argument with one that he refutes, but rather an Ad Hominem.

    Edit : I'd add that yours is also an Ad Hominem, which makes it quite ironic.

  • Your point is valid, but the insults aren't needed. Please remove them and I'll restore your comments.

  • But how can they win this war if they don't hit civilian? Nobody win a war like that! (/s)

  • As will any moz://

  • No, thank you.

    That article, which is from 2015 btw, explain it well. NPAPI caused crashes, and a lot of security issues, that's why they were removed.

  • We already crossed many times their "red lines". This is just the good old "China's Final Warning".

    They are already barely managing to slowly advance against a single foe, which is still transitioning between the old soviet warfare ways toward NATO's one, with far less soldiers, I doubt they would ever hold against the full alliance firepower.

  • I think this would be a first. So there is no real methodology in place right now.
    But I'd really like to get the community involved for the decision making, that's something we'll discuss internally, but in my opinion I'd like for it to work as following :

    1. The community, LW admin, or the mods express the need for new rules <- We are here
    2. Internal discussion between mods, and, if needed, LW admins, to make sure the new or updated rule is conform to LW rules and what we wish to do with the community.
    3. Once the draft of the new rule is done, we'd publish it as draft to get feedback.
    4. Once most people agree on the new or updated rule, we will start enforce it, first with a bit of leniency, then more strictly.

    What do you think about that ?

  • I do agree. I'll raise the question with the others mods and we'll decide on a new rule if necessary.

  • I agree that OP could make more structured and elaborate threads, but I wouldn't call him a clown or spammer for that much.
    Might I remind you that you can just ignore him if you don't want to see his threads? Like that those who wish to engage on those threads still can and you won't be bothered anymore.

    If OP break a community rule or a site wide rule, we will ban him, after warning him, but not otherwise.

  • That's to be expected. You can't go to war expecting everything and everyone to come back.

  • This should probably be posted on a programing community.

  • Removed the parental advice part. I didn't want to be an asshole, believe me.

  • To me it looks like you don't have enough power, either on the Pi4 side to decode, or the mini-pc to encode.

  • We sure use water, but I don't think it is used in the energy production mechanism.