DreadPotato @ DreadPotato @sopuli.xyz

Posts

19

Comments

482

Joined

2 yr. ago

That solved it, printing with PETG was just a strange coincidence then, but I've never seen this before.

I think the stoned look is just her default look, googles or not...maybe "resting stoner face" is a thing 🤷‍♂️

Yeah maybe that's what's causing my issue, although it's a bit more extreme in my case than his. I'll definitely give that a try.

I did some more testing, also with different slicers, and it seems to not actually be a PETG specific issue, but rather a model/speed issue. I can get it running without stops if I just reduce print speed. When I set speed to 100% I start getting these weird 10-20 second long stops.

So now in thinking it's the controller locking up because it's overloaded by too many small movmeent gcode commands in rapid succession?

Love...bucket loads of pure love

Nope

VW and Volvo both make some pretty bad EV's IME, they have a ton of software issues and the entire infotainment system is insanely slow and buggy, which is a big problem when thats the main interface to the car. The interior is also very low quality. But these are probably general issues for them though and not strictly their EVs.

It's an anycubic Kobra 2.

It's not small blobs like here, it's huge blobs because the printhead doesn't move for 10-20 seconds, so filament from the chamber keeps oozing while it just sits there.

Did printing with PETG ever work with your printer?

I have done a few prints in PETG before, only 2 or 3, but they didn't have the issue.

You could create two gcode files for the same model, one for PLA and one for PETG and see if something stands out in their difference.

Yeah I was planning on trying this when I get home.

It still happens with low temps that are in PLA range. I tried a temp tower starting from 220°C, so the upper end of PLA temps, and it still happens. I can print PLA with 220°C without stuttering, so I don't think it's a power issue. But I'll check nonetheless.

It happens randomly, it may do several layers without stopping at all, but then it suddenly stops. It happens often, but not at the same spot, and not with fixed layer offsets.

I find that DDG is terrible at finding anything regionally specific, probably because I'm not in the US. I always get a shitload of US hits and usually some German hits if I try to specify location...neither are useful to me.

Anyone is allowed to mimic or copy anyone's style. A style is not something that you can copyright, only the individual works.

Whether it's a voice actor relying on voice acting to not go broke, or a factory worker relying on menial tasks on a production line to not go broke doesn't really matter IMO. But pretty much no one bats an eye at the latter.

Replacing an assembly line worker with a more efficient machine creates jobs as the machines need to be manufactured, serviced, designed, and replaced. Jobs are created in shipping and logistics as factories are able to create more product. Meanwhile the costs of goods go down and benefits the whole economy.

Ah, but we don't yet see the repercussions of this technology. Automation initially removed far more jobs that it created, and the people it replaced mostly couldn't benefit from this change.

I disagree with it on the arbitrary standard that art is sacred.

That kind of opens a completely different discussion on what should be considered "art" or worthwhile of consumption, but I get your point.

Impersonating my voice? Not really something I have an issue with as such. From the article they are using the voice of the actor to impersonate a fictional character. If someone used my voice to create a fictional character like done here, I probably wouldn't have an issue with that.

I completely agree, but why would there be a skill-component to the ethicalness of impersonation? Is it equally unethical if a person used a voice-changer? It requires the same amount of skill as the AI.

Hiring a sound-alike isn't taking a job out of the economy for one. The original voice is able to accept the job at the pay rate the sound-alike took usually.

That is a Luddite approach to the subject I would say. Technology has always displaced jobs and rendered some skills useless. For a long time it has just only occurred to unskilled and/or manual labour, most people have no issue with that. Now we're starting to see skilled and creative labour getting hit by it, but why should that be any different?

Well, scams are unethical regardless of method used. It would equally unethical if done by a human. So that's not the difference.

And Impersonators are already profiting off of someone else, since they're specifically hired to mimic someone.

The other points you mention all boil down to being ethically wrong because it's easy, which doesn't really make any sense IMO. why is a thing ethically wrong just because it's easy, if it wasn't ethically wrong when it was hard?

Would you consider a person using a voice-changer to mimic ethically wrong?

Why is it that when a human impersonator mimics a voice, it's just fine. But when a computer does it, it becomes a huge ethical issue?

I'm not saying they're not wrong here, I just find it interesting that using an organic method of recreation (an impersonator) is considered fine, but an electronic method (the "AI" in this case) is considered ethically wrong.

What makes adguard home better than pihole? Genuinely curious, I'm running pihole now and have been for a couple of years without issues.