Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
0
Comments
901
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Jerboa is technically First party. Doesn't brand itself as the Lemmy app though.

  • Probably were prescribed them at an earlier date but stopped taking them and had them left over. Also even over the counter ones can be deadly if you take too much of them, they are safer these days but it's still not impossible.

  • For Twitter it really doesn't make sense because it has become undebatably a "Nazi bar", metaphorically since they aren't an actual bar, but they still support and tolerate Nazis (and other manners of horrible people). Some people insist that it isn't and there are "normal level headed people there" but that doesn't matter, it's still a Nazi bar, because it accepts and tolerates Nazis. How can someone expect to not be judged for going to and hanging out in a place like that?

  • The one on the left is a MAGA, they're unable to listen to logic even if the answer is right in front of them.

  • Some of their communities are also insanely aggressive compared to their .world counterparts, both in spirit and moderation. Really best to stay away from them, if at all possible.

  • I'm in a few but as a general rule I try to avoid most of the ml instance communities because some of them can be a bit on the toxic side.

    Generally I stick with the ones that are on the same server as my account i.e. !linux@lemmy.world on my lemmy.world account and !linux@programming.dev on my programming.dev account with exceptions to ones where I don't have presence on that instance, or I have limited purpose of having an account there (i.e. my lemmy.blahaj.zone account only serves to moderate the Aroace and Agender communities), in which case I usually choose the one which has been most reliable. Part of the reason I did it this way was because in the early days when Lemmy.world had load issues and was being DDoSed federation would have a lot of issues,

  • Well right wingers want to ban books and services like IA make that harder since they provide easy access to download or digitally borrow those books. It makes it harder for them to deny people access to those books since they can find them online. Of course, there are other ways people can still obtain those books, IA isn't the only one, but it's the easiest and the most convent.

  • He likes his giant Blåhaj (probaby not an actual Blåhaj)

  • I'm in agreement. The social credit idea really doesn't bode well. Karma resrictions on Reddit are one of the bad parts of Reddit and I for one am glad that it's not a thing here.

  • That's why it's really important to have an option to share your own instance communities without receiving ones from others. Allows others to know of you, while not taking on more data load than you have to.

  • I don't know, it's hard to say what actually happened. I will admit that it seems weird but I don't want to jump to conclusions about how or why they did it, maybe you could post about it on !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com to get different opinions on it.

  • I mean I think that's the idea, they didn't want people blocking the instance to disrupt normal discussions by hiding the users.

    Their intent wasn't to offer an alternative to defederation, but rather for blocking all an instance's communities manually.

  • Yeah I saw it on their modlog. It's very useful to check the modlogs of remote servers, especially since admin comments removals and site-bans for remote users don't federate in the modlog.


    (which your agreement to could be seen as agreement with trans-segrigation in sports).

    Nah, I was explaining how the only way to get better at chess is to play better people, and there's no reason for any classes based around gender. And the explanation for difference in skill, is simply that the best men refused to play women, so they never improved. The first female grand master was only that good because her dad was crazy good and made her and her sister play him constantly.

    You need the experience of high level play to be able to play at a high level, and any gender divide in division just prolongs that. So I was arguing against any segregation at all.

    I guess it was likely a miscommunication or misunderstanding. They probably thought you meant something different than what you actually meant.

  • You were banned in blahaj.zone for your comment on Chess:

    They take the whole trans women allowed/not-allowed in sports thing very serious there, and I agree with them mostly. The sports thing is a dog-whistle transphobes use because it sounds reasonable even though it really isn't. It is especially unreasonable in a game like Chess (which your agreement to could be seen as agreement with trans-segrigation in sports). It's likely they reacted way too harshly, outright permanent instance bans over something small like that are very extreme, a warning would've probably been the best thing to do, maybe a temp ban at most.

  • Lately sh.itjust.works been more good about nuking spam and troll accounts, and they also have automated defenses set up to mitigate abuse.

  • You may want to consider the fact that instance blocks on the user side don't actually effect that, they are not in any way like defederation, not by a long shot. They simply filter communities from those instances, and not much else. It doesn't even hide user interactions from those instances.

  • There is also only so much that should be done, since they should have the right to run their own instance however they see fit.

    Disagreed, I've seen them trying to force their hand on other instances into running things the way they want them to, so I think it's only fair others hold them to some standards as well. After all in the Fediverse there is some leverage you do have to get other instances to compromise, by way of simply refusing to operate with them anymore. Obviously that doesn't mean completely bossing them around, which is why I said compromise, not comply. It also is still their choice whether or not to follow through, it comes at the cost of them no longer inter-operating with servers they refuse to compromise with, but I think that's more than fair enough as a trade off.

    It is also a good idea to push for alternatives, but even so, if the issue isn't addressed it will still be problematic on those problems due to the size and weight the instance and its communities carry in the Fediverse.

  • “So what, it’s the fediverse, you can use another instance.”

    Dismissal of this type of criticism by just telling people to use another instance or saying "fediverse is decentralized" is unproductive, and honestly should be called out as harmful because it ignores the fact that instances when they become large enough and centralized enough, carry weight and can be extremely problematic like shown here.

    A big part of dealing with these types of problems is to make people aware of them, another one is to deal with it at the instance level by defederating the problematic instances and cutting off the communities so that network effect doesn't continue to rear its ugly head. Just creating new communities isn't enough, if it was this wouldn't be the problem that it is. When people tell others to stop complaining and dismiss the criticism because the fediverse is decentralized it seems like they either don't understand the issue, or they would just rather it not be addressed.

    So while many people would prefer we just leave well enough alone, that's not condusive to these problems being dealt with, people need to talk about them, and action needs to be taken.

  • They don't actually care about life, they just don't want women to have control over their bodies.

  • There are some instances which can't handle the load of communities being pulled into them, since it does eat up a lot of storage. It would be good if there were a mode that allows federating an instance's communities outward without pulling in any from other instances.