Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
13
Comments
512
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • No offense but license infringement is such a weak argument because there isn't anything to really enforce these licenses. They aren't watching us in our homes, they can't forcefully remove it from our computers. It is gatekeeping that people choose to feed into. They talk big and act small, you're not supposed to play the game if your account is deleted or the service closes, but there isn't anything stopping you from doing it, they're just trying to gatekeep you. No real point in listening to them.

  • Steam DRM isn't even really DRM in the traditional sense and it's very easy to put games into a program or use an injected/patched .dll to bypass the Steam Launch check. It's annoying sure but it's not something that people should be concerned about.

  • People going on about being authorized do do this, not authorized to do that. General rule, don't listen to others telling you what to do and what no to do if they can't enforce their own rules. Steam and the rest of the digital corpos talk big, and act small. Do what you want, play your games not through steam, they handed the files to you and asked you nicely not do do what you want with them, you're perfectly free not to listen to them, and honestly you shouldn't listen to them 🏴‍☠️.

  • Something to consider is that they don't consider people not buying their games as revenue loss in these studies because most of these studies are deliberately fudged to support their narrative. They can't do anything about people just not buying their games, they wish they could but they also aren't going to say it out loud because it doesn't help their cause.

  • 2FA in lemmy is a gimmick more than anything else, it's more trouble than it is worth and comes with a significant risk of losing your account. It is better than it used to be but I still wouldn't consider it good. Best to just not use it.

  • There's nothing funny, it's an anti-joke.

  • Should've pirated it, mobile game companies are sleazy douchebags more often than not, and so are the stores they often sell the games on.

  • Good point, they certainly could've been.

  • I think most people develop a positive association with them because of the pleasant effects. That hasn't happened to me yet though, and probably won't. I prefer when my drinks taste good, like actually taste good like a fruity fizzy drink, not like I'm drinking something fermented way past its prime. I still do drink wine or beer in social gatherings to fit in but I don't really enjoy it. I just have them when there isn't anything else.

  • This is Lemmy's 2FA implementation, most of the corporate ones are still not great. Probably not this bad though.

  • There really isn't any need, it's very much overkill. I'd say in the vast majority of places where it is asked it is not needed and can even be a bad thing due to the risk of losing account access.

  • I'm really not a fan of 2FA since if I lose or break my phone in most 2FA implementations you just get locked out. Nothing to do. Even with TOTP keys it's just an extra password I have to remember. I don't want to do that, the marginal increase doesn't feel worth the risk of being locked out of my account.

    So I just won't use 2FA, especially on Lemmy of all places. Oh how I've heard the horror stories of people using the early 2FA implementation and getting locked out. Not me, not ever, people may say it's better these days but this still doesn't seem worth it.

  • I thought I had posted it but I forgot to hit send, silly me. I posted it now.

  • I'm not really into the idea of archiving posts and not being able to reply to older posts anymore. Was one of the more annoying things on Reddit, and I'm glad they did away with it, or at least made it optional. Sometimes you just need to add something new to something old ya know.

  • I’ve been on red for over 7 years now. It’s one of the best resources for music on the internet. Calling members “nobodies” for defending a community we care about is pretty lame.

    Disagreed, people will defend their community whether it's a good community or not. And yes you and the others here sticking up for them are nobodies to me, and likely to the rest of us in the thread. People think the practice is shady, and they're right to, a tracker could easily use such information against you if they fold or turn. But see, people who are with them either don't think of these things or they deliberately avoid the topic because, like you yourself said, they're defending a community they care about. So even if the ones they follow do things that are generally sketchy or seen as unacceptable they will still stick up for them, because they are there and they care about them and are willing to ignore the bad and shady stuff.

    I understand being skeptical about requiring the use of home internet to connect to the site.

    Clearly you don't because if you did you wouldn't even bother trying to stick up for them, making excuses for them, or trying to make me feel bad for calling you and the others who stick up for them what you are to people here, nobodies.

  • It's less about cutting them off as a person and more about banning them from a page, group, or platform. Like banning them from a Mastodon instance or Lemmy server.

  • You know how in these kinds of discussions there's always a bunch of nobodies who come crawling out of the woodwork to defend the person or group being accused or pointed out for doing shady shit. I don't know it just seems weird and suspicious. Apparently I'm not the only one who noticed because they're getting rather aggressively downvoted.

  • Seems like a honeypot to me, telling people to use something other than their home's connection. Kind of difficult to prove. Really seems like they want that information specifically for the purpose of going after those people, since you know, ISP subscriber ID, can't get that if they use the Library, a friend or acquaintance's house, or an Inn or AirBnB, not saying you couldn't track someone down with those if you wanted to, but it's not as convenient.

  • MSFT Rule

    Jump
  • Hopefully their stock goes down even more, anything that makes the shareholders suffer is a good thing.

  • Lemmy isn't impervious to vote manipulation either unfortunately, I encountered someone in a thread earlier who was getting botted, one downvote for every upvote in lock-step with each other. Good news is that Lemmy admins will squish them if you report sussy voting behavior.