Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DO
Posts
1
Comments
825
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I mean, I'm glad you agree. As a community the only thing people can do is make posting censored content something taboo. Hopefully after enough of this people will get the hint. I mean, it's working, if you're annoyed by it then just engage with content that doesn't have this unnecessary censorship and downvote and move on from posts that do. That way you'll avoid people whining about censored words, there's a whole genre of posts that have exactly none of that.

    There's plenty of reasons why in these posts. Hell, you ostensibly agree that these words shouldn't be censored but you come to the posts and ask why it's a big deal? The reaction isn't too extreme, it's simply the only thing to do if we want to keep the community clear of this without trying to get the mods to censor the post themselves or something. So it's quite literally the least big deal to make while still trying to shape the community.

    As I mentioned, the only reason to try to get these posts to stop is either you're in favor of censorship or you're in favor of maintaining the status quo in order to not see these comments, which is tacitly in favor of the censorship as that is the norm right now.

  • It's conservative in the most basic sense of the word (not in our modern political sense). You see someone upsetting the status quo (questioning why people need to censor things on an internet forum) and the reaction is: "Why do these people care so much? It's fine, there's no problem with censoring it's never bothered me." Most people think this way, but most people don't post about it.

    There are two different ways to take it: one way is you actually agree with the censorship but either don't have an argument or don't want to argue so instead vaguely post about apathy, painting the other side as losers who care too much.

    Another way is what I said before, it's a reactionary "ugh" as you pass by, wondering why people have their panties in a twist about someone censoring the word "kill" from one meme.

  • Unfortunately, I think apathy towards this, (while very cool and nonchalant and badass don't get me wrong) is about as annoying.

    And it's interesting that I see these posts posing as apathy under every single complaint about censorship. I mean at some point it's reactionary.

  • Sure, I'm just saying If you want a version of "authentic" native American food a lot of what we call Mexican food is alive and well in the modern day. I'm sure cornmeal was a staple of a lot of the US before modern borders and we categorized it as central American food.

  • Things we would call "Mexican" food are indigenous food. Mole, empanadas, certain types of salsa. We just call it something else. I mean, they had corn and tomatoes all the way up most of the U.S.

  • Idk, it seems worse that he's self aware. Before it could be dumping these women because he gets some "ick" about them that he can't explain. It turns out the ick is a deeply misogynistic fetishization of youth, but if he didn't put any thought into it at least you could say he's a toxic product of his culture.

    If he's aware of it then it's something he could be working on and changing and he instead makes the active choice not to do anything about it.

  • It's because every childrens show is an abstraction of real life relationships meant to teach lessons or just generally have cooler adventures than real life.

    So yeah, of course when you have an episode where there's a loving caring character you can say "that's actually their mom" or the spunky side kick can actually be their sister.

  • I mean, lots of "libertarians" are frothing at the mouth to defund our military but agree that the government should at least subsidize healthcare and education with some of those funds. The terms we have are loosey-goosey and most people are incoherent policy to policy. We've just been sorted into groups by a century of two-party propaganda.

  • Yeah it's a clever lie that's perpetuated that says progressives have no where to go if they try to break from the Democrats. But secretly a more progressive platform would actually draw over a lot of disaffected libertarians and lite conservatives who only vote conservative because they've been convinced that they should only vote in opposition to Democrats instead of in favor of anything.