Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DO
Posts
24
Comments
171
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Yes, we absolutely do. There are lots of other sea fairing cultures that managed to turn inland.

    I'm sorry, it's just completely implausible that there were people in America for ten thousand years without making any movement inland. Not only does it not make any sense, all the evidence we do have that maybe they were already on America comes from sites very far inland. Following your logic they made it to New Mexico and then back leaving only a single set of footprints behind. And never left the sea shore again? No.

  • That's the majority of human migration. We follow water bodies, but not to the exclusion of all growth. By that logic we'd never have made it inland at all.

    There's no logical reason for a supposed pre Clovis culture to not go inland. 10,000 years and you really think they stayed 10km from the waves that whole time? It makes no sense. They would be the only group in human history to do that and they'd have needed to do it for millenia

  • Why go inland is answered by looking to every other group of people on the planet. Which is why there's so much evidence for those older cultures across the earth. It's not a brand new space after 10000 years. There's no reason for every group of people to hug the coast for that long.

    Not to mention that the evidence being presented for that theory is primarily very very far inland. Like the new Mexico footprints that are supposedly 23k years old.

  • Unlikely. The limited evidence presented for pre Clovis cultures in North America has some large margins for error and rely on big assumptions. This evidence is no different, and should be taken on context of it being a big maybe.

    One of the biggest problems with the pre Clovis theory is that there should be waaaay more evidence of humans in that time frame like we see everywhere else on the world. It's highly unlikely that humans were in N America for more than 10, 000 years and left barely any trace across two continents.

  • There are bones of several movies buried there. One of them could have been decent. Way too many studio edits and reshoots

    Ant man hit at the wrong time for the MCU. A few years earlier and it would have been dismissed as a one off. Now it's the flag ship of Marvel's failings.

  • To what end? The more spread out they are the less engagement they have and the sub flounders. Look at what happened to r/android. Went from being one of the largest communities on lemmy.world to puttering along on their new instance, losing a good chunk of users back to Reddit where everything is simple and in one place.

  • What discourages people to join is not knowing which instance to join. Which is exactly how we got two communities branching off like this.

    What discourages people from joining is acting like "federation Yay" is actually a selling point instead of a nuisance that you have to accept. Just look at the downvotes this got in minutes. How is that encouraging?