There's some surprisingly sci-fi stuff that's possible with image deconvolution. Not exactly practical, but it is possible to recover some information from a blurry photo.
I mean sure, if we include violent reactions to non-violence and place the goalposts just so, then yes, absolutely everything includes violence...
But as far as "any big moves or changes" you mention, Gandhi's movement for non-violent resistance is the posterchild for doing exactly that without violence. It exposes violent state power as ultimately impotent when faced with massive, collective and coordinated non-violent resistance.
And Gandhi was not "nice" just because he advocated for non-violence... He and his followers used coordinated, active efforts to cripple the mechanisms upholding British rule. The British hated him for it.
I'm not sure I understand the point you're trying to make.
Thank you for saying this in a way that it could sorta land... I should know better than to try to articulate a nuanced point in response to the "umm actually" crowd.
It's tied to the US for very good reason. Israel is effectively a vassal state to the US, and the US has used its veto power at the UNSC dozens and dozens and dozens of times to block resolutions directed at Israel, all while providing it with arms to commit atrocity after atrocity. If you don't see how the US is deeply enmeshed in this, you are simply misinformed. This situation wouldn't happen wothout US interference.
What more is a figurehead good for then? A figurehead is the government personifed, and you're complaining about taking a shot at it using that framing. Are you proposing that Biden is not getting enough flack and all our energies are being wasted on Harris? Because I really don't think that's happening here.
You're technically correct, but so wrong in your critique of this. It's a political framing that may not be Fact, but it is True - she's the voice of the government, lamenting a disaster that it created. In much the same way that you present a fact that doesn't get at the Truth.
She's literally the Vice President of the USA - one of the faces that represent the government. Not some random powerless person. If it's not directed at her personally, then who personally should be named and shamed?
I mean, you're not wrong - but it's a technique used every day for super-resolution microscopy.