DoPeopleLookHere @ DoPeopleLookHere @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

134

Joined

5 mo. ago

Do you? Because made up satistics are still made up.

This is how misinformation starts.

If your not sure, google it before commenting. For the sanity of the internet.

Not the person you replied to.

I mean that's all good and fine, but it's still off topic at best?

They're valid problems to have, but no one here asked you to. Yours is a root comment.

It's not an airport, there's no reason to announce your departure.

That's just Alberta....

No GDPR does not require google to display app permissions like that...

Your just making things up.

Are they? What law?

That's also not an excuse to not try.

I'm not saying legality is ethical.

I'm saying there's no practical way to assemble that much material without exploration at some level.

Because they're barely legal in certain places?

But how does it get more authentic without actual input if what's accurate.

It's not enough to tell and AI that's somethings wrong. You have to also tell it what was right.

totally ethical thousands of photos of drawings of children in sexual contexts

Legality is just a technicality

Okay there bud.

But if it's not accurate, will pedos jerk off to it?

Okay, and those drawings are my problem.

https://www.icenews.is/2010/07/28/unsavoury-cartoon-ruling-sparks-debate-in-sweden/

It's not clear cut that those are okay.

But to know if it's accurate, someone has to view and compare....

Yes but you start with the basics of a cat and a dog. So you start with adult genitals and.......

It was able to produce that because enough images of both feet and Donald Trump exist.

How would it know what young genitals look like?

You better believe when the cops come knocking, the burden of proof to be ethical is wholly on you.

All existing solutions are based on real life images. There's no ethically way to acquire thousand upon thousands of images of naked children to produce anything resembling real.

That's how existing solutions work.

So again, how can it be done ethically?

You can't prove a negative. That's not how prooving things work.

You also assume legal images. But that puts limits on what's actually legal globally. What if someone wants a 5 year old? How are there legal photos of that?

You assume it can, prove that it can.

How can it be trained to produce something without human input.

To verify it's models are indeed correct, some human has to sit and view it.

Will that be you?

How can it be made ethically?

That's my point.

It can't.

Some human has to sit and make many, many, many models of genitals to produce an artificial one.

And that, IMO is not ethically possible.

Okay, but my point still stands.

Someone has to make the genitals models to learn from. Some human has to be involved otherwise it wouldn't just exist.

And if your not willing to get your hands dirty and do it, why would anyone else?