DoPeopleLookHere @ DoPeopleLookHere @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

134

Joined

5 mo. ago

Then they will never script anything. They will never automate a task themselves. They will only ever operate a computer manually, interactively, rather than programmatically.

Here's the thing.

Most people don't care about automation. They just don't.

The objective of Linux is to put the spoon on the tray of your toddler’s high chair. Linux encourages her to pick it up, poke it at her food, and keep encouraging her to learn, to develop and build on her skills, until she is asking for the fork, the knife.

And your still refusing the point. People don't want a knife and a fork. You can't make them want it. They want something they can intuitively understand. Because to most people, tech is a basic tool to get another job done.

Most people only need a basic hammer, screwdriver, etc...

That's all they need to do what they need day to day to get other things done.

Machinists need more complicated tools with tons of settings, complicated setup and saftey to know. So they spend the time learning. But you don't need a wood shop to hang a picture frame.

This is before we even talk about accessibility. That means much more than large fonts or screen readers. It's also about the fact humans exist on distribution curves in every possible way. For some people, it will just never make sense. No matter what you do. Because it's just not how their brains work. In the same way mine can't do languages very well. It just doesn't click for me. And deep dives into computers wont click for some. Should they never learn to use a computer? Or can they learn basic enough functions from good GUIs to get by.

It's even fine to say linux isn't meant for that. But if you want everyone to get away from macOS and Windows, you need a viable alternative for everyone

As a trans, AuDHD, DID system, I'm tired to buddy.

But the only way to not feel like that is community.

It doesn't have to be much. Libraries offer ton of programming for all kinds of folks. Just start showing up unabashedly and if they don't like it, you don't have to stay either.

But the only way to survive is together.

How about you start organizing community?

That's something you can actually do to resist.

It’s like this whole situation is coming from an imagination of a ten year old child.

It's from a "man" who's been drugged heavily for decades it might as well be.

America has had Canada invasion plans for centuries.

Also that has nothing to do with what I said.

How does qualifying a threat make it better?

Okay, still a non sequiter then, because that law has nothing to do with what you responded. Which was the point of getting that law, because no where does it call the actions you replied to moderation.

And for all I know your a Russian troll so have fun with that.

This website is filled with people who were banned for just that. Check out /c/Reddit ( pretty sure it's on lemmy.world)

So yea, it's happening, and is exactly what you were replying to. Calling that moderation is a pretty far stretch.

https://web.archive.org/web/20250313203719/https://slate.com/technology/2025/03/reddit-elon-musk-luigi-mangione-censorship.html

I'm gonna need an EU law citation there.

Because banning people for upvoting the word Luigi isn't EU law.

That's not what they're asking for. They're asking for the ability for it to not generate that sentence again.

Sure, but are you suggesting they somehow encoded, falsely, that they were a murder?

Because it's very unlikely.

It fabricated this from no where. So there's nothing to delete. Because it's just a response to a prompt.

Your still placing more intent and facts into those processes than actually exist.

You cant even get it to count how many letter p are in the word apple. At least not last time I tried.

That storage your talking about isn't facts. It's how sentences are structured and what they "mean".

As for the output "meaning" it's still just guessing what you want to hear. No facts involved.

It's not unreadable, it doesn't exist.

The responses are just statistically what sounds vaugly what you want to hear.

They can erase the chat responses, but that won't stop it from generating it again.

Generative AI doesn't start with facts and work from there. It's just statistically what you want to hear.

So the general tailscale actually uses peer to peer wiregaurd connections. Headscale is the middle point to negotiate these wiregaurd connections.

So none of the traffic moves through the VPS.

As for a VPS itself, it's noore unsafe than your local bare metal. It's still an application publicly exposed and needs basic precautions like fail2ban or crowdsec

It's has its place for sure.

But the physics are far more against satalite.

But the reason I don't believe in large scale satalite systems for consumers is because they're disposable. They all fall down or contribute to the growing space junk problem.

So it's not really any better at the end of the day than just burying a fibre cable for 40 years.

Because building space ports and rocket launches have 0 impact as well.

But you acknowledge this, so what's your point? Why pay a techno billionaire when we can publicly fund cables way cheaper and more friendly?

If we can figure out how to put them on the bottom of the ocean and pipelines over just about any terrain, I think we can figure this out

I'm not saying your doing it intentionally.

Bur it is how it starts.

Edit the person I replied to didn't use probably. Then you came in with a probably statement. That's how miss information starts. People supporting bullshit with "probably"

A link to it will do