DoPeopleLookHere @ DoPeopleLookHere @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

134

Joined

5 mo. ago

but what good is that if AI can do it anyway?

It can't. It just fucking can't. We're all pretending it does, but it fundamentally can't.

https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/10/12/apples-study-proves-that-llm-based-ai-models-are-flawed-because-they-cannot-reason

Creative thinking is still a long way beyond reasoning as well. We're not close yet.

Because it test what you actually retained, not what you can convince an AI to tell you.

Fun fact, abortion is only legal because of a supreme Court ruling in Canada.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Canada

AFAIK fair use means you can redistribute.

I'm wrong about why,

But it's been ruled as fair use

Decompiling doesn't give you the code like you'd expect.

It gives you the instructions the code generates.

There's a Lego island decomp documentary on YouTube that is recomend for more details.

But the actual source code used doesn't get piped out. Instead you get the machine instructions and you make code that generates the same instructions.

Meaning your still writing the game yourself, meaning you own the copyright

It's more than fascists, but I do hold plenty of love for those willing to show love in my life.

"People" just don't however.

When the world decides to stop hating me for my existence.....

It's not focusing on one thing at a time, it's people having a limited number of fucks to give right now.

I'm a trans lesbian, and I really don't care when pride is celebrated. Because it's not really about pride anymore at all. It's all about corporate rainbow washing. So why would I care what month that happens in? I'd much rather deal with that problem than the month it's celebrated in.

My understanding is clauses that own work made outside of work (hours, resources, nonncompeteing scope, ect...) is not enforceable.

But if you do anything related to the company, then it's theirs.

Canadian software developer here,

It's really not. Contracts like that in Canada and US haven't been used widely in a long time.

So the first line of what you quite says you can't.

I'm a professional developer. If I learn and use it in my job, I'm in violation of the licese.

What I mean by value is the ability to learn and use it as you wish. Without worry of if your going against a license.

What's the point of source available if I'm never allowed to derive value from it?

I'm not confusing the two. If I copy the "source available" and accidently remember it in a "commercial" product, I'm technically hooped. It's considered derivative work and therefore I'm in violation of the license. Regardless if I'm a simple app dev or Google.

Also, like I said a few times now. I done own the code I contribute. Technically meaning if you contribute code, and use that snippet in a commercial context, again, your in violation of the license.

This is why copy left is the defacto standard. The author of the code retains copywrite ownership of it.

Your still resolving solved problems.

I never said anything about you or your arguments. I was talking about the analogies the person used to antagonize everyone. And I love how you glossed over all of that to get a little bit hurt at me.

But while your here, your fighting the wrong battles.

Because we are much stronger doing things in the open than we will trying to pick and choose who gets to do what. Even small utilities can contribute to people learning and adapting.

So what if google also benefits? They benefit off of using TCP, SSL, and thousands of standard technology. Should those be charged as well? It's such a boogy man at the cost of other people learning and benefiting from what you've done the same way you benfit from others. It's not about gatekeeping, it's about being community.

I'm gonna draw another place I think too much effort is being given to making sure the "correct" people benefit and that's selective welfare programs. It's costs shit tons of money to administer programs like food stamps. When if we gave everyone UBI, it wouldn't matter. Because everyone gets it.

EDIT: In a copy left license, I still own the copyright to my work. So there's that as well.

But all that on a shelf. I don't give a fuck what you do with your software. I just don't want to be called a racists for whatever reason because I believe in community owned software.

Oh yeah. People believing in community built and owned software, that runs the entire internet, is totally the same thing as racism. 🙄🤣

Just because you don't agree with the views of open source, doesn't make them brainwashed.

Because here, you come off as deranged calling others religious fanatics.

EDIT but what's really fucking funny to me is you call other people religious fanatics and racists. Or at least like them. While you fanatically paste the anti commercial linecse thing like it's 2012 Facebook again.

90k isn't the wealthiest 20%.....

EDIT I stand corrected https://www.statista.com/statistics/484838/income-distribution-in-canada-by-income-level/

But still waiting for an actual good reason.

And not to mention the drug plan only covers 2 types of drugs.

It's such a liberal thing to do it based on income instead of it being universal. I still haven't heard a good reason.