I guess then why is this currently the law? If we give him this exception then remove the need for bond for everyone. Otherwise it's just the poor that get fucked once again.
How about this. The fact the appeals court didn't even give a reason for the decision. So can the next person that wants to appeal cite this? Not really because there's no reason to cite. The piss judges couldn't even be bothered to release their rationale.
Sure but doesn't mean you can't be applying and interviewing on their dime. This bullshit isn't anything new and only leads to the company retaining the blow average employees. If you can leave and get a raise in the process you should.
Ehh sorta "She acknowledged the existence of a romantic relationship, but she said that it began in 2022, after Mr. Wade began working for the district attorney’s office, and that the physical element of the relationship ended before the indictment was handed up in August."
Might be part of the requirement for running a business is you have to have a restroom available. When's the last time you were in a restaurant without a bathroom? I'm sure they all don't just supply one because it'd be weird to not, instead it's probably part of the license req.
I agree. They need to be properly funded to go after the rich assholes hiding behind lawyers. The recent funding is a good thing IMHO. Because otherwise the norm is to continue targeting folks like you.
Then don't even try bro. Don't vote, don't work on campaigns. Hey don't even go on forums to talk about how fucked the system is. Because it's all fucked. Just don't. That's your motto here.
So your argument here is they shouldn't go after those people now? No, I get you're annoyed that you got fucked in relation to these fucks, but this is a step in the right direction right?
I guess then why is this currently the law? If we give him this exception then remove the need for bond for everyone. Otherwise it's just the poor that get fucked once again.