Dippy @ Dippy @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

71

Joined

2 yr. ago

Take 100mil off his comp for employees, divide by their 57,000 UAWs listed above, divide by 52 (weeks), then 40 (hrs). Gets you an 0.84$ per hour per employee.

In reality, based on latest filing, CEO’s comp for 2022 was 21 mil so 0.16$ raise per employee if you didn’t pay the ceo.

Ford did 484mil $ in buy backs in 2022. Would give each 4$/hr raise

Seen this a few times. Rarely does the ceo taking less really make much of a dent for people living paycheck to paycheck. Yea 16 cents is better than nothing but also not what these people need.

It does not matter to your false statement of an 8B$ aid package. Reading comprehension is a good skill to have.

Please send links on proposed 8B package?

That’s not what I’m disputing, because it doesn’t matter. I’m disputing your claim that Biden just announced an 8 billion dollar aid package which has shown to be false.

There could be one in the works, but what you are referencing was a photoshopped version of an old aid package.

They have not actually. There is no official release and many news articles are stating it to be false.

        No, the press release announcing this action is a doctored version of an old release.



  

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna119372

https://www.wusa9.com/amp/article/news/verify/white-house-israel-aid-hamas-attacks/65-a713fc2d-5d77-4b08-be3c-98de302a45f5

Yup. Every company will follow the same model. Why wouldn’t they when it was clearly successful. Not everyone accepted it, I canceled Netflix, more because of a lack of content that didn’t justify the price if I couldn’t share it.

Slowly more and more will be raising the black flag and soon some new service will come out, and the cycle will repeat itself.

Thanks. Already too many with so many different communities too! I like number 2. If people want their link out there can post it in the first one. Thanks for the work your doing!

Nepotism, as I think the secretary of education was his step brother? So still a little corrupt.

Good thing for the article to note…

True, but

Took some time to find, but if their life span is 2 years, then this uptick would make sense, if not then could be bad. Lots more info should be in the article though.

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho did seem more entertaining at least then the circus we’ve had for the last few years. At least we can look forward to that?

Plus Ow! My balls! Does seem like some good tv.

Yea lots of detail lacking from the article. What is their expected life, and how many do they lose on average per month/year.

Interesting the solar activity could be knocking them out, but without a baseline, does anyone know if this is significant/beyond what’s expected?

O agreed, however, just opinion pieces are redundant and not interesting to keep reading over and over. I like seeing the data that backs it up vs people just saying it’s declining.

I actively avoid twitter links at this point, never have any substance anyway.

An interesting read actually, and while it still has the Elon bad bias, it’s nice to have actual data to back up usage statistics instead of opinion statements.

THAT SENTENCE HAD TO MANY SYLLABLES, APOLOGIZE!

The title reads in my head that he made the request to himself to recuse himself, and he denied himself.

Anyway, good, average citizens don’t get to pick their judge, and without a real reason, he shouldn’t either.

The indictment only contains the basics of the case and the charges against him. There is said to be over 11 million pages of evidence, the indictment is 45.

Indictment:

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

11 million source:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-lawyers-challenge-limits-evidence-sharing-prosecutors-warn-threats-2023-08-11/

Charging and indictments: https://www.justice.gov/usao/justice-101/charging#:~:text=The%20indictment%20contains%20the%20basic,citizens%20called%20a%20grand%20jury.

At what point then would you say you are allowed to investigate someone of something?

For the Clarance Thompson thing (funny my phone keeps trying to write clearance, which makes sense what he’s being accused of), someone had to have a suspicion and dig into it, found something, built a case, then put it out there. I assume you agree with that method?

That’s what I feel should happen here. Again as I said, should gather their evidence, build a case, and get an indictment. Without one, everything they say means nothing. I do disagree with putting it out in the public like this, to me that’s already coming close to, if not already, defamation.

As I said previously:

“I also hope anyone using this as a political weapon faces legal repercussions as well if it can be proven.”