Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DI
Posts
0
Comments
378
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Yes, I'm glad companies never change their minds about their policies. When they set a date they always keep to it and have never gone back to it due to consumer demand. Oh except they do that a fair bit. Guess we'll just have to see what Microsoft actually does when it comes time.

    32 years is indeed young lol. Maybe you are young yourself so it seems older? There are companies that are hundreds of years old that have gone bankrupt in the last few decades, why would Linux be any different? Again, it may work for now but who knows in the future. But 32 years is nothing. There are older Unix-based systems like Itron and QNX still around and commonly used, but not sure they'll last.

    And to your last point, I can just keep Windows 10 past 2025... It's not like lack of support forces me up. Do you not realize how many people still use unsupported versions? Check out the XP life cycle: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP#Support_lifecycle

    95% of ATM's were still using it for example 5 years after mainstream support ended.

  • Windows has always been free for me so it's no big issue. But yes, as a current Windows 10 user my point still stands that the best of both worlds is using it IMO. Have the widest support for games and can easily remove any bloatware you want from it already.

    You are the one who originally changed the goal posts about it being changed in 2 years time and that being an issue. I'll worry about that in 2 years time - for all we know Microsoft will extend the support.

    But also to your point, Linux is very young itself so you can't expect it to always be around. Once it's around for 100+ years sure, but I just don't see that being a thing. There'll come a time where it's no longer relevant.

  • This is human nature at end of day. If it's not being white/black, it's your football team, what country you're from, or on lemmy crap like whether you use Linux or not.

    I never understood it myself but people are morons.

  • So you won't buy a Samsung because it may allow remote access, but the first thing you do on your phone is to remove as much access and problematic software as possible since it's riddled with it.

    Just keep arguing with yourself, I won't stop you.

  • Yes. Unfortunately people who buy Apple don't care. This is what happens when you prioritise brand and design over functionality. You end up paying more for the brand (worse shit, but hey you can feel good about buying such a great product!).

  • Lol. The irony of recommending a Chinese brand over Samsung because of concerns of what they'll do with your data/wanting control is hilarious.

    Samsung might shut down your phone remotely. Xiaomi does give your data over to Chinese government. I would pick Samsung over Xiaomi any day.

  • It isn't 100% clear, but all evidence suggests Elon Musk did not have millions inherited and was largely done through his own work. His parents had little to do with his success in America.

    This is heavily disputed - but is described by several neutral sources as well as by Isaac Walterson in the biography of Elon Musk, and I do trust him as a good biographer.

    Not to say he didn't grow up privileged which does make an impact, but not a case of just receiving millions for free.