DigitalTraveler42 @ DigitalTraveler42 @lemmy.world

A digital citizen

---

Read more

Posts

5

Comments

921

Joined

2 yr. ago

Aww gee didn't hear her complaining when it didn't effect her, she's been kissing Trump's ass this entire time.

Who is trying that for that? Just sounds like dumb right winger propaganda to generate an overreaction to "cancel culture" as usual to me.

How are you going to do Rod Stewart like this? lol.

But that's the crazy thing, he can't afford the lawyers, even Ghouliani is suing him for unpaid debts, and that's Trump's other woman.

Bro fr who tf cares this much? lmao fucking get a life.

Really, that's how acting works? Gee i would have never guessed that. /s

Do you know how to spot bad acting? The same way you can spot people lacking confidence, there's tells, and she doesn't seem to have any here, either she's getting hers or she's content with what she's got going on in that department. Because realistically that's what it's all about, not like you would get a lot of aesexual incels, right?

But hey dude, enjoy that superiority complex you got going, I'm sure you can do so much better while hate posting two chicks clowning incels.

Yeah I'm sure you're talking from experience OP, lol.

You can tell by her confidence, if she wasn't getting her fair share she wouldn't be able to say what she's saying so confidently, because looks aren't everything, confidence and charisma can make up for a lot, plus it's almost always easier for women to get theirs.

Y'all hating but as big and unattractive as she is there's definitely some dude (or chick) getting in those guts, unlike incels.

It's constantly a slippery f'n slope with these people, and they always want to keep on sliding down that slope.

Burying the lede for clicks seems to be a major fucking problem with journalism these days.

Investigators have identified the remains as Kawsheen Gelzer, a 40-year-old registered sex offender who was arrested for sexually abusing a 12-year-old boy in 2004, according to court documents.

Gelzer is a known drug dealer who went missing after visiting Stines and her husband, Nicholas McGee, law enforcement sources said. He may have died during an ongoing narcotics dispute with the couple.

https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/01/26/brooklyn-woman-with-freezer-full-of-body-parts-charged-victim-idd-as-sex-offender-police/

NY Daily News is the best major newspaper in the city, and way more details than OP's article.

I'd say to specify the type of selfishness as entitlement.

The positive thing about this incident though is where it happened and the resources available to those animals, like the North Shore Animal League, which usually does outstanding work with situations like this, and then there's the Bronx Zoo, which may have a pretty troubled past, but leads a network of zoos and sanctuaries, so these animals will get taken care of most likely.

This idiot though should get the book thrown at him, and probably will.

If he's not dead of course he would, he's a malignant narcissist that we're going to be dealing with until he croaks.

Had a whole gang of dudes like this in the Marines too, you said they're just built different, I say they're just nicotine addicts.

Weed

Exactly, my thoughts were always "well i guess they can be as miserable as the rest of us married folks, misery does love company after all."

But Fr I'd never have supported gay marriage on the level that I do if the conservatives weren't fighting so hard against it. it's simple, let consenting adults love who they love, anything else is over thinking it or pushing religion on the rest of us.

McArdle has described herself as a "right-leaning libertarian."[23] David Brooks categorized her as part of a group of bloggers who "start from broadly libertarian premises but do not apply them in a doctrinaire way.

McArdle began blogging in November 2001 with a blog called "Live From The WTC," which arose from her employment with a construction firm involved in cleanup at the World Trade Center site following the September 11 attacks. She wrote under the pen name "Jane Galt," playing on the name "John Galt," a central character in Ayn Rand's Objectivist novel Atlas Shrugged. In November 2002 she renamed the site "Asymmetrical Information," a reference to the economics term of the same name. That blog had two other occasional contributors, Zimran Ahmed (writing under the pen name "Winterspeak"), and the pseudonymous "Mindles H. Dreck."

McCardle was an outspoken supporter of the Iraq War both before and after the invasion by the United States. She later made a partial admission of error for this position [10]

Another post by McArdle, from April 2005, discusses why she takes no position on the issue of same-sex marriage. She wrote: "All I'm asking for is for people to think more deeply than a quick consultation of their imaginations to make that decision... This humility is what I want from liberals when approaching market changes; now I'm asking it from my side [libertarians], in approaching social ones."[11]

In 2009, she criticized an article in Playboy by eXile Online editors Mark Ames and Yasha Levine which detailed the influence of the Koch brothers in American and Tea Party politics. Playboy took down the article as a result of the negative response.[13]

McArdle has been critical of the libertarian politician Ron Paul, taking him to task for not strongly disavowing racist statements that appeared in his newsletters,[25] arguing against his championing of tax credits, and accusing him of lacking specificity about cutting government spending.[26] McArdle was also quoted as saying that Ron Paul "doesn't understand anything about monetary policy," and that "he wastes all of his time on the House Financial Services Committee ranting crazily."[27]

Lol

Since 2009, McArdle has argued extensively against instituting a system of national health insurance in the United States, and specifically against the federal health care reform bill the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which was signed into law in March 2010. In addition to a number of blog posts on the subject, she also wrote an article, "Myth Diagnosis," in the March 2010 Atlantic.[31]

In a July 2009 blog post, McArdle listed two reasons that she objected to such a system: first, that it would stifle innovation, because "Monopolies are not innovative, whether they are public or private," and second, that "Once the government gets into the business of providing our health care, the government gets into the business of deciding whose life matters, and how much."[32] Commentator Ezra Klein of The Washington Post criticized this post, writing, "In 1,600 words, she doesn't muster a single link to a study or argument, nor a single number that she didn't make up (what numbers do exist come in the form of thought experiments and assumptions). Megan's argument against national health insurance boils down to a visceral hatred of the government."[33]

In an August 2009 post, McArdle reiterated, "My objection is primarily, as I've said numerous times, that the government will destroy innovation. It will do this by deciding what constitutes an acceptable standard of care, and refusing to fund treatment above that. It will also start controlling prices."[34]

In a comment to that post, McArdle stated, "The United States currently provides something like 80–90% of the profits on new drugs and medical devices. Perhaps you think you can slash profits 80% with no effect on the behavior of the companies that make these products. I don't." In a subsequent Washington Post online chat, a commenter asked her, "You said that medical innovation will be wiped out if we have a type of national health care, because European drug companies get 80% of their revenue from Americans. Where did you get this statistic?" McArdle responded that it was "a hypothetical, not a statistic." This was criticized in a blog post in The New Republic.[35] In response to this criticism, McArdle stated that she had misunderstood the question, and "thought the commenter was referring to the postulated hypothetical destruction of all US profits." She also stated that, though "there are no hard numbers available," she estimated that the U.S. contribution to pharmaceutical profits was at least 60%.[36]

McArdle married Peter Suderman, an associate editor for the libertarian magazine Reason, in 2010.[37]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megan_McArdle

This woman is a Libertarian ass and her views come from the highest levels of privilege.

Just another loser desperately seeking a group to accept them.

Oh yes let's care about what Putin's Irish mouthpiece has to say...